1991
DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(91)90554-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface problems in aluminium matrix composites reinforced with coated carbon fibres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The reaction at the carbon-aluminum interface at temperatures above 500°C to form aluminum carbide (Al 4 C 3 ) has long been considered to affect critically the strength of C/Al composites. Improper wetting and chemical reactions at the interface during synthesis or under service conditions can degrade the mechanical properties of the composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The reaction at the carbon-aluminum interface at temperatures above 500°C to form aluminum carbide (Al 4 C 3 ) has long been considered to affect critically the strength of C/Al composites. Improper wetting and chemical reactions at the interface during synthesis or under service conditions can degrade the mechanical properties of the composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TiB2 deposition uses TiCl 4 and BCl 3 gases, which are reduced by Zn vapor. To alleviate this problem, a layer of pyrolytic carbon is deposited between the fiber and the ceramic layer [259]. During composite fabrication, the TiB2 coating is displaced and dissolved in the matrix, while an oxide ('Y-Al2 0 3 for a pure aluminum matrix, MgAl2 0 4 spinel for a 6061 aluminum matrix) is formed between the fiber and the matrix.…”
Section: S3 Wetting Of Reinforcement By Molten Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successfully regressed equations, which were significant at the 99% level, were as follows: % reflectance = −11.50͓I ͑001͒ րI ͑100͒ ͔ + 34.77 (15) % reflectance = −40.17͓I ͑001͒ րI ͑101͒ ͔ + 35.96 (16) Equations (15) and (16) had R 2 values of 0.466 and 0.472, respectively. Using linear regression, correlations were identified between reflectance and, as before, the I (001) :I (100) and I (001) :I (101) ratios, but not for the I (100) :I (101) ratio.…”
Section: (9) Orientation Vs Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using linear regression, correlations were identified between reflectance and, as before, the I (001) :I (100) and I (001) :I (101) ratios, but not for the I (100) :I (101) ratio. The successfully regressed equations, which were significant at the 99% level, were as follows: % reflectance = −11.50͓I ͑001͒ րI ͑100͒ ͔ + 34.77 (15) % reflectance = −40.17͓I ͑001͒ րI ͑101͒ ͔ + 35.96 (16) Equations (15) and (16) had R 2 values of 0.466 and 0.472, respectively. Reflectivity increased as the extent of the preferred crystallographic orientation decreased.…”
Section: (9) Orientation Vs Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%