Ifcee 2015 2015
DOI: 10.1061/9780784479087.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface Properties of Metal-Grid and Geogrid Reinforcements with Sand

Abstract: Reinforced earth or soil structures are becoming increasingly popular in the present day. For proper design of any reinforced structure, it is important to study the soilreinforcement interface properties. The interaction mechanism can broadly be classified into two types: direct shear mechanism and pullout mechanism. In this study, tests were performed as per ASTM D5321 to study the interface characteristics of two types of reinforcements commonly used in practice (geogrid and metal grid) with Indian standard… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under different normal stresses (i.e., σ n = 25 kPa, 50 kPa, 75 kPa, and 100 kPa) and relative densities (i.e., D r = 50%, 70%, and 90%), the shear stress-displacement behavior of the GRCS and URCS interface basically show different degrees of strain-softening. This conclusion is consistent with Wang et al [25], Liu et al [38], Anubhav and Basudhar [39], Umashankar et al [40], Esterhuizen et al [41], and Seo et al [42]. From the perspective of normal stress, for example, when D r = 50% and the normal stress is 100 kPa, the peak shear stress of the geogrid-calcareous sand interface is 3.39 times that of when the normal stress is 25 kPa, and the corresponding displacement of the peak shear stress is 17.01 mm and 34.8 mm when the normal stress is 25 kPa and 100 kPa, respectively.…”
Section: Interface Shear Stress-displacement Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under different normal stresses (i.e., σ n = 25 kPa, 50 kPa, 75 kPa, and 100 kPa) and relative densities (i.e., D r = 50%, 70%, and 90%), the shear stress-displacement behavior of the GRCS and URCS interface basically show different degrees of strain-softening. This conclusion is consistent with Wang et al [25], Liu et al [38], Anubhav and Basudhar [39], Umashankar et al [40], Esterhuizen et al [41], and Seo et al [42]. From the perspective of normal stress, for example, when D r = 50% and the normal stress is 100 kPa, the peak shear stress of the geogrid-calcareous sand interface is 3.39 times that of when the normal stress is 25 kPa, and the corresponding displacement of the peak shear stress is 17.01 mm and 34.8 mm when the normal stress is 25 kPa and 100 kPa, respectively.…”
Section: Interface Shear Stress-displacement Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Abu-Farsakh and Coronel [46] discovered that the interface shear strength coefficient of geogrid-sand ranges from 0.90 to 1.05, and is suitable for various soil density and water content conditions. Similarly, Liu et al [38] pointed out that the shear strength coefficient Umashankar et al [40] concluded that the shear strength coefficient of the geogrid-sand interface ranged from 0.97 to 0.81. However, in this study, the R e under different relative densities and normal stresses are all greater than those above of terrigenous sand, indicating that the reinforcement effect of geogrid embedded in calcareous sand filler is more significant than that of terrigenous sand.…”
Section: Reinforcement Effectmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results also showed that the values of the coefficient a for Samples 2 and 3 are higher in the critical stress state. The higher values of the coefficient a for the critical state have been also presented by, e.g., [17].…”
Section: Results Of the Testingsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The test can be done using a physical model on an adequately reduced scale or using an actual scale field test, see e.g., [12]. A failure caused by the soil sliding on the interface with a geogrid depends on the shear strength of the soil-geogrid interface, which can be determined using a large-scale direct shear test apparatus, e.g., [11,[13][14][15][16][17][18]. The reduction or increase in the shear strength properties of the soil-geogrid interface is given by the coefficient α, which represents the ratio of the shear strength of the soil-geogrid interface and the shear strength of the original unreinforced soil, e.g., [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%