2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4959250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface structure in nanoscale multilayers near continuous-to-discontinuous regime

Abstract: Interfacial atomic diffusion, reaction, and formation of microstructure in nanoscale level are investigated in W/B4C multilayer (ML) system as functions of thickness in ultrathin limit. Hard x-ray reflectivity (XRR) and x-ray diffuse scattering in conjunction with x-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES) in soft x-ray and hard x-ray regimes and depth profiling x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) have been used to precisely evaluate detailed interfacial structure by systematically varying the individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that in the discontinuous region of both the earlier two cases (ref. 28 and 29 ), as the thickness was decreased, minimization of a certain degree of interface width was observed, which is unlike the general increasing trend, due to minimization of surface free energy as a result of compound formation. Similarly, Vainer et al 30 observed an increase in roughness as period thickness decreases below the layer continuous limit of the ultra-short period ( d = 0.8–1.5 nm) W/B 4 C ML.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noted that in the discontinuous region of both the earlier two cases (ref. 28 and 29 ), as the thickness was decreased, minimization of a certain degree of interface width was observed, which is unlike the general increasing trend, due to minimization of surface free energy as a result of compound formation. Similarly, Vainer et al 30 observed an increase in roughness as period thickness decreases below the layer continuous limit of the ultra-short period ( d = 0.8–1.5 nm) W/B 4 C ML.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“… 28 Whereas, in the second case, the individual thickness was varied (∼2.45–0.87 nm) keeping the thickness of the other layer fixed above the continuous limit. 29 In the first case, as the period decreases from 4.94 nm to 1.34 nm, the density contrast ( ρ W − ρ B 4 C ) decreases from 14.2 g cm −3 to 11.1 g cm −3 . In addition, although the interface width of W layers decreases from 0.63 nm to 0.36 nm, the physical roughness of W layers increases from 0.05 nm to 0.13 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…where v is the momentum transfer factor, and it is given as v = 4sin λ , and Ru is the reflectivity of an identical smooth surface, and  is the root mean square, rms, the roughness of the surface. The rms roughness value is quantitatively equal to interface width  for interfaces and it, in turn, equals the sum of the interfacial roughness and interfacial diffusion [39].…”
Section: 𝜋mentioning
confidence: 99%