Comprehensive Structural Integrity 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b0-08-043749-4/08148-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial and Nanoscale Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that there is a school of thought that insists that fractal geometry, rather than differential geometry, is the only meaningful approach when dealing with polycrystalline fracture surfaces [35][36][37][38][39]. Also note that the grain boundary area between the two intersections with the cleavage cracks in figure 7b would ultimately fail by some other mechanism, possibly ductile shear [15,16,22,[27][28][29]. This modelling result is consistent with the theoretical framework (see figure 3 and [15,16]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that there is a school of thought that insists that fractal geometry, rather than differential geometry, is the only meaningful approach when dealing with polycrystalline fracture surfaces [35][36][37][38][39]. Also note that the grain boundary area between the two intersections with the cleavage cracks in figure 7b would ultimately fail by some other mechanism, possibly ductile shear [15,16,22,[27][28][29]. This modelling result is consistent with the theoretical framework (see figure 3 and [15,16]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, algorithm 4 does not take into account the full complexity of cleavage propagation across a grain boundary in three dimensions (e.g. [15,27,28]).…”
Section: Cleavage Representation In the Cellular Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%