2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.04.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial behaviour, wettability alteration and emulsification characteristics of a novel surfactant: Implications for enhanced oil recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
101
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
14
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected concentrations were 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, and 10,000 ppm. The value of IFT decreased with an increase in the surfactant concentration, which is similar to the results discussed by Pal et al (2018) where they used a synthesized sodium ethyl ester sulfonate surfactant to reduce the IFT and alter the wettability of rock surfaces. For the l-Arg surfactant, a sharp decline in the IFT curve was observed from increasing the concentration to 2000 ppm, wherein the IFT was reduced by about 50%, from 34.5 to 18.0 mN/m (red color on Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of Surfactant Solutionssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The selected concentrations were 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, and 10,000 ppm. The value of IFT decreased with an increase in the surfactant concentration, which is similar to the results discussed by Pal et al (2018) where they used a synthesized sodium ethyl ester sulfonate surfactant to reduce the IFT and alter the wettability of rock surfaces. For the l-Arg surfactant, a sharp decline in the IFT curve was observed from increasing the concentration to 2000 ppm, wherein the IFT was reduced by about 50%, from 34.5 to 18.0 mN/m (red color on Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of Surfactant Solutionssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The chosen concentrations for this measurement were 100, 200, 400, 500, 800, 1500, 6000, and 8000 ppm. It is shown from Figure 8 that with the increase in surfactant concentration, the values of IFT are decreasing in the presence of kerosene, as also depicted by a previous study [58], where the different concentrations of sodium ethyl ester sulfonate surfactant were synthesized for measurement of IFT reduction in the presence of kerosene. It is shown from the measured values of IFT between the dodecanoyl-glucosamine surfactant and kerosene that IFT values are higher in the higher concentrations, and it rapidly decreases as the concentration of surfactant decreases up to optimum surfactant concentration and, thereafter, the decrease in IFT values is very minimal, as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Interfacial Tension Measurementssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Pal et al with the design and synthesis of a coconut oilbased anionic surfactant investigated their effect on EOR. Their results, in addition to ultra-low interfacial tension, show moderate wettability, suitable temperature stability and improved recovery by surfactant in the presence of polymer (Pal et al 2018a). Kumar and Mandal synthesized and used a group of carboxybetaine-based surfactants with 12-, 14-, 16-and 18-carbon hydrophobic tails.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%