2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.104.184512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial control of vortex-limited critical current in type-II superconductor films

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute our observations to the critical current being determined by the vortex flow. Our results confirm that the SDE is caused by unequal vortex barriers on the two side surfaces of the film 27,29 .…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We attribute our observations to the critical current being determined by the vortex flow. Our results confirm that the SDE is caused by unequal vortex barriers on the two side surfaces of the film 27,29 .…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…While a majority of the theoretical work has focused on the critical depairing mechanism, the critical current in type II superconductors is often determined by the vortex surface barriers [24][25][26][27] . The supercurrent tries to pull vortices nucleated on one edge towards the other side, where they can be annihilated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the field increases, an apparent weakening of the Meissner response results in a sublinear dependence of Ic on B. This could be due to penetration of vortices into the SC layer, which is estimated to happen around ~10 Oe for the films investigated here 11 . It is convenient to define 𝐵 𝑠 = 𝑗 𝑐 /𝑎 as the field scale where the critical current vanishes, assuming a linear extrapolation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In such a FFLO-like phase, Cooper pairs gain a finite momentum 𝑞 0 , and the depairing effect for supercurrents flowing parallel and anti-parallel to 𝑞 0 is different, leading to a critical current nonreciprocity. On general grounds, interfaces cause inversion symmetry-breaking and Rashba SOC along the normal z direction thereby admitting a polar and odd-undertime-reversal vector 𝑇 along 𝑧 × ℎ, where ℎ is an applied magnetic field or an exchange field induced by an adjacent ferromagnet (FM) 11 . Thus, application of an in-plane magnetic field perpendicular to the current flow direction should activate 𝑇, resulting in peculiar superfluid condensate properties and a critical current nonreciprocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%