2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6636(00)00030-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial debonding analysis in multiple fiber reinforced composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been established that whilst the peak value and area of the T-S curve are vital for capturing the interface separation behavior, its precise shape is of less significance [30]. Consequently, for simplicity, the bilinear T-S law [29,31,32] shown in Fig. 2 is selected for the present study.…”
Section: Cohesive Zone Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established that whilst the peak value and area of the T-S curve are vital for capturing the interface separation behavior, its precise shape is of less significance [30]. Consequently, for simplicity, the bilinear T-S law [29,31,32] shown in Fig. 2 is selected for the present study.…”
Section: Cohesive Zone Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the FEM discretization of a representative volume element (RVE) with many heterogeneities involves a problem with a large number of degrees of freedom (the RVE contains the heterogeneities characterizing the microstructure of the composite). Such problems have been analysed by Ghosh et al [74], who have developed a plane finite element model based on a polygonal Voronoi cell [75]. Inconveniences due to the use of random distributions of inclusions and defects can be avoided by assuming a periodic distribution of such heterogeneities.…”
Section: Fig 123 the Size Requirements Of A Representative Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…T-S curve can be considered as a representation of the constitutive relation of the equivalent interface [9]. A bilinear assumption model [25][26][27], in which a critical energy release rate G c and a cohesive strength s u are vital to capture the interface separation behavior [9][10][11]15,28], is employed in this study. Owing to the combined loadings, a complex stress state of the joint is present with mixed-mode (Mode I and II) damage propagation, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Czmmentioning
confidence: 99%