2017
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b07365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial Electrochemistry in Liquids Probed with Photoemission Electron Microscopy

Abstract: Studies of the electrified solid-liquid interfaces are crucial for understanding biological and electrochemical systems. Until recently, use of photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) for such purposes has been hampered by incompatibility of the liquid samples with ultrahigh vacuum environment of the electron optics and detector. Here we demonstrate that the use of ultrathin electron transparent graphene membranes, which can sustain large pressure differentials and act as a working electrode, makes it possibl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society using higher-quality graphene with fewer defects would reduce the number of sites for preferential attack, but this is practically limited by the quality of graphene that can be reliably obtained by CVD. Stacking multiple graphene layers may also be beneficial, as the probability of two defects overlapping will correspond to the square of the defect density of SLG, and this approach has indeed been used in several reports to improve stability [98,99,108,133], although it comes at the expense of reduced photoelectron transmission, as discussed earlier. Instead of this, other 2D materials could be employed which are more resistant to oxidative attack such as h-BN [134], however its insulating behaviour is likely to result in undesirable charging during measurement.…”
Section: Chemical Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society using higher-quality graphene with fewer defects would reduce the number of sites for preferential attack, but this is practically limited by the quality of graphene that can be reliably obtained by CVD. Stacking multiple graphene layers may also be beneficial, as the probability of two defects overlapping will correspond to the square of the defect density of SLG, and this approach has indeed been used in several reports to improve stability [98,99,108,133], although it comes at the expense of reduced photoelectron transmission, as discussed earlier. Instead of this, other 2D materials could be employed which are more resistant to oxidative attack such as h-BN [134], however its insulating behaviour is likely to result in undesirable charging during measurement.…”
Section: Chemical Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has included X-ray absorption measurements of the O K-edge of liquid water acquired in partial electron yield (PEY) mode [98], as well as similar Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) measurements [108]. This approach has also been applied to detect Cu ions in aqueous solutions of CuSO 4 and H 2 SO 4 during electrochemical cycling [133]. Measuring the Cu L 3 -edge at different potentials reveals differences in the ratio of Cu + to Cu 2+ ions as the graphene membranes is biased relative to a Pt counter electrode, consistent with copper(II) ion reduction on the graphene electrode.…”
Section: Solid-liquid Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third approach is to reduce the thickness of the solid. Graphene-capped microchannels 4 , 5 or an electrochemical in-situ cell with graphene windows 6 8 used exactly that strategy to enable soft X-ray spectroscopy of a solid–liquid interface. In the latter case, it is assured that the liquid phase has bulk properties, but the fragile, atomically thin windows pose a high risk to the experimental setup (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this MCA platform, we studied the pure water and electrochemical reaction in aqueous electrolytes, such as CuSO4 with different electron imaging and spectroscopy techniques. [4][5][6] In this study, we found that secondary electron (SE) yield from graphene membrane on the top of electrolyte sensitively depends on the MCA cell polarization potential. The SE depends on the electron density of states in the graphene and within EDL as well as the local potential inside the electron escape depth region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%