2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5078739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial properties of hydrocarbon/water systems predicted by molecular dynamic simulations

Abstract: The presence of small hydrocarbons is known to reduce the interfacial tension of the gas-water interface, and this phenomenon can affect the formation of the clathrate hydrates of these gases. In this work, the interfacial behavior of the pure methane-, ethane-, and propane-water, and the ternary 90:7:3 mol. % gas mixture of (methane + ethane + propane)-water were studied with molecular dynamics simulations. The interfacial tension, γ, and z-density profiles for the gases and water from simulations of the gas-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for a rigorous determination of g one should include long range corrections (LRC) [131e134] which give a positive contribution to g. We have implemented the methodology of Lundberg and Edholm [134] and estimated this correction to be about 2 mJ/m 2 for the methane-water interface (the thickness of the interface was 0.28 nm and the magnitude of the dispersion density difference squared was ðDr C6 Þ 2 Â 10 20 ¼ 0:15 J). This is in line with the small value of the correction found by Naeiji et al [135]. The values obtained after including the LRC correction are presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, for a rigorous determination of g one should include long range corrections (LRC) [131e134] which give a positive contribution to g. We have implemented the methodology of Lundberg and Edholm [134] and estimated this correction to be about 2 mJ/m 2 for the methane-water interface (the thickness of the interface was 0.28 nm and the magnitude of the dispersion density difference squared was ðDr C6 Þ 2 Â 10 20 ¼ 0:15 J). This is in line with the small value of the correction found by Naeiji et al [135]. The values obtained after including the LRC correction are presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…6 right) using the Madrid-2019 force field to describe the water-ion interaction. Notice that the methane molecule presents positive adsorption at the water-gas interface both for pure water and for the solution as was also found in previous work ( [135,139]). Methane also shows positive adsorption when salt is added to the solution.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Studies reporting vapour-liquid interfacial properties focus on a large variety of different systems and applications, such as enhanced oil recovery [18,20,23,[95][96][97][98][99][100], natural gas [19,22,[101][102][103][104][105], CO 2 absorption and carbon-capture and storage (CCS) [20,79,102,[106][107][108][109][110][111], refrigerants [112][113][114][115], evaporation and nucleation [32,116], environmental science [117][118][119], process and chemical engineering [15,17,26,83,108,[120][121][122][123], polymers [124,125], fundamental physics [7,13,14,…”
Section: Review Of Literature Data On the Enrichment At Vapour-liquid Interfaces And Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because there is no well-defined gas−liquid interface as described in thermodynamics (Gibbs' dividing plane) at this scale; 31 instead, there is a sub-nanometer-thick region in which the molecular density changes continuously, as is often observed in MD simulations. 32 Therefore, it would be difficult to apply the thermodynamic definition of the contact angle at this scale, which considers the gas−liquid interface to be a definite surface. Also, we would like to clarify that the size of these nanoparticles (∼2 nm) is not the threshold for pinning caused by structural inhomogeneity because its strength is determined not only by structural heterogeneity but also by chemical heterogeneity, which may be significantly large between the metal particle and the graphene.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%