1989
DOI: 10.1002/sia.740140104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial reactions between Al and RuO2, MoOx and WNx diffusion barriers on Si

Abstract: The interfacial reactions between A1 and RuO, , MOO, and WN, diffusion barriers on Si (100) wafers have been studied. The diffusion barrier structures were analyzed before and after various heat treatments using Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and cross-seCtional transmission electron microscopy (XTEM). Al was found to reduce the oxides of both Ru and Mo. A 100 di thick A1,0, layer developed between the A1 and the RuO, films during annealing at 500°C for 30 minutes. The formation of interfacial Al,O, effwien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although widely investigated, only a marginal degree of stability has been achieved with most metal-nitride, 1-9 boride, 10-13 oxide, 6,14,15 and carbide 16 -20 barriers because aluminum reacts with the vast majority of these interstitial compounds. Also reactive with Al, many amorphous barriers [21][22][23][24][25][26] have had no advantage over their polycrystalline counterparts, despite their supposed lack of fast diffusion paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although widely investigated, only a marginal degree of stability has been achieved with most metal-nitride, 1-9 boride, 10-13 oxide, 6,14,15 and carbide 16 -20 barriers because aluminum reacts with the vast majority of these interstitial compounds. Also reactive with Al, many amorphous barriers [21][22][23][24][25][26] have had no advantage over their polycrystalline counterparts, despite their supposed lack of fast diffusion paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%