2011 IEEE 61st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ectc.2011.5898700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial reliability and micropartial stress analysis between TSV and CPB through NIT and MSA

Abstract: As Moore predicted in 1965, the scale of microelectronic devices continues to diminish at tremendous speed, and today the limitations of conventional 2D scaling make such 3D applications as TSV (through-silicon via) and high-stacked thin-die packaging technologies extremely attractive. However, their complicated structures and thermal-cycled processes generate enormous interfacial stresses. In particular, TSV-to-CPB (copper pillar bump)-stacked structures manufactured under various processing conditions have s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee et al [5] show that thermal stress can damage TSV interconnects, leading to delamination at TSV interface with the bonding pad. Void growth can also occur during normal operation due to thermal load [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lee et al [5] show that thermal stress can damage TSV interconnects, leading to delamination at TSV interface with the bonding pad. Void growth can also occur during normal operation due to thermal load [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These challenges are highlighted and novel solutions have been proposed for improving testability [7]- [10], yield, and reliability [11]- [16]. Various types of TSV defects caused by manufacturing process and thermal stress are highlighted in [4] and [5]. Out of all these defects, this brief focuses on three TSV defects: 1) void; 2) delamination between TSV and landing pad; and 3) TSV short-to-substrate, as these have been extensively studied by test community as highlighted by [7]- [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The via-middle scheme is proper for enhancing poor design flexibility in the via-last process and overcomes both compatibility problems with conventional packaging processes and the high-resistivity difficulty of poly-silicon to meet the temperature conditions of FEOL (front end of line) above 1000℃ in the via-first process. Moreover, copper is the best material for via-filling because it can fill a comparatively large volume and has good electrical performance [1][2]. Nevertheless, copper-filled TSVs experience many reliability problems due to the many thermal loading processes such as BEOL (back end of line), wafer-level bumping, and packaging processes over 350-400℃ after the via-middle process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the most serious copper-induced issue is the thermal stresses that can be large enough to cause TSV-pumping (or extrusion) between the copper TSV and the silicon wafer, ductile fracture at the bump interfaces, UBM (under-bump metal) and device metallization, and electric degradation due to the change in carrier mobility [2][3]. The stress-induced failure modes and mechanisms can be classified into three groups according to the origin of stress [2]. The Cu area (inside the TSV) has two stress-generating mechanisms: extrinsic thermal stress due to CTE mismatch and intrinsic stress due to rapid grain growth during the thermally loaded processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation