Atomistics of Fracture 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3500-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial Segregation in Multicomponent Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any event, it appears already for the simple case of binary alloys that mere numerical correlations do not identify the physical mechanism with certainty, as each correlation can appear as good.. . or as bad as the other [18,20]. …”
Section: Binary Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In any event, it appears already for the simple case of binary alloys that mere numerical correlations do not identify the physical mechanism with certainty, as each correlation can appear as good.. . or as bad as the other [18,20]. …”
Section: Binary Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For both, the driving force for segregation in austenite is high (higher than in ferrite, due to the lower solubilities) and both have been shown to segregate at higher-than-equilibrium levels in steel. 31,34,35) Sulfur and phosphorus exhibit very similar behaviours in austenite: comparable diffusivities, similar segregation energies (sulfur's is higher) and nearly identical diffusion kinetics. 36,37) Although it has been shown that sulfur can segregate preferentially when in competition with phosphorus 34,35) in the range 500 to 700°C, this effect diminishes with increasing temperature, as does the overall magnitude of the segregation energy-an effect that is offset by the lower solubility of phosphorus in austenite as compared to ferrite.…”
Section: Comparison Of Solute Elementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…31,34,35) Sulfur and phosphorus exhibit very similar behaviours in austenite: comparable diffusivities, similar segregation energies (sulfur's is higher) and nearly identical diffusion kinetics. 36,37) Although it has been shown that sulfur can segregate preferentially when in competition with phosphorus 34,35) in the range 500 to 700°C, this effect diminishes with increasing temperature, as does the overall magnitude of the segregation energy-an effect that is offset by the lower solubility of phosphorus in austenite as compared to ferrite. 38,39) In addition, the bulk concentration of sulphur in the tested material is far lower than that of phosphorus.…”
Section: Comparison Of Solute Elementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, this element has a strong tendency to segregate at grain boundary and to induce cold brittleness. Segregation formulation was developed by Guttmann and Mclean in a ternary system (Fe, M, I) [4] based on the sublattice model in melt salts and stoichiometric phases contributed by Hillert et al [5] . Li et al extended the segregation equation into a five-element system [6] , and generalized it into a multicomponent system as [7] : [7,8], assuming that interaction energy keeps the same on grain boundaries and in matrix and omitting the interaction between impurities and vacancy and between metal element and iron, a series of parameters [7,8] can be listed as follows:…”
Section: Trip Steel Containing Pmentioning
confidence: 99%