2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5141346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial solvation can explain attraction between like-charged objects in aqueous solution

Abstract: Over the past few decades the experimental literature has consistently reported observations of attraction between like-charged colloidal particles and macromolecules in solution. Examples include nucleic acids and colloidal particles in bulk solution and under confinement, and biological liquid-liquid phase separation. This observation is at odds with the intuitive expectation of an interparticle repulsion that decays monotonically with distance. Although attraction between like-charged particles can be theor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
75
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for the observed high-concentration dynamics could be a slowdown in the solvent diffusion with increasing polymer concentrations. This phenomenon has been observed for many polymer–solvent systems and might be particularly strong for polyelectrolytes due to the ordering of water around the ionic groups. In this scenario, the scaling laws outlined in Section 2.1 need to be applied with β­( c ) > η s . Mackie et al’s obstruction model expects the solvent diffusion coefficient ( D s ) to depend on the polymer volume fraction (ϕ) as Equation has been shown to correctly describe the dependence of D s on polymer concentration for many polymer–solvent pairs, including polyelectrolytes .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for the observed high-concentration dynamics could be a slowdown in the solvent diffusion with increasing polymer concentrations. This phenomenon has been observed for many polymer–solvent systems and might be particularly strong for polyelectrolytes due to the ordering of water around the ionic groups. In this scenario, the scaling laws outlined in Section 2.1 need to be applied with β­( c ) > η s . Mackie et al’s obstruction model expects the solvent diffusion coefficient ( D s ) to depend on the polymer volume fraction (ϕ) as Equation has been shown to correctly describe the dependence of D s on polymer concentration for many polymer–solvent pairs, including polyelectrolytes .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter restriction could for example be alleviated by using a more general EE scheme 8 (see Conclusion section therein) involving damped charge transfers throughout the entire molecule, applied with a smooth atom-based truncation of the non-bonded interactions in the simulations. 152 Efforts are currently in progress along these different lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrostatic forces between helices may turn from repulsive to attractive thanks to the presence of high-valence cations such as spermine (4+) and spermidine (3+) or small proteins such as protamines and H1 histones [17][18][19][20]. Several theoretical accounts of these effects have been proposed, suggesting that the hydration forces [21][22][23], ion chemisorption [24], structuring of the ion clouds [25,26] or bridging [27][28][29] may all play a role in the effective DNA-DNA attraction, although no consensus exists as to their relative contributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%