2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial stresses in FRP-plated RC beams: Effect of adherend shear deformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
1
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
55
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…16 ] s reduces considerably the debonding stresses. This last observation, without taking into account the fibers orientations in the composite plate, is in agreement with conclusions of Zhang and Teng [25]. It can also be seen that FE results at mid-plane of the adhesive layer match quite well with previous closed-form solutions.…”
Section: Assumptions Of the Modelingsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 ] s reduces considerably the debonding stresses. This last observation, without taking into account the fibers orientations in the composite plate, is in agreement with conclusions of Zhang and Teng [25]. It can also be seen that FE results at mid-plane of the adhesive layer match quite well with previous closed-form solutions.…”
Section: Assumptions Of the Modelingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In fact, these stresses can produce the brittle fracture of the concrete layer, which supports the composite laminate, followed by the premature failure of the strengthened beam. Many closedform solutions have been developed by researchers for the interfacial stresses [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Smith and Teng's solution [21] gives an accurate estimation of interfacial stresses but does not take into account the FRP plate fiber orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristic common to most analytical solutions is the assumption that materials exhibit linear elastic behavior. Recent studies in this regard have been authored by Tounsi and Benyoucef (2007), Yang et al (2007), and Tounsi et al (2009). Another assumption shared by these solutions is that stress is constant across the adhesive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E f,S /E f,P =1.35), this result seems to confirm that the reinforcement thickness particularly affects debonding behaviour. Indeed, the greater the thickness, the higher the increase in the normal and shear stresses at FRP to concrete interface and consequently the probability of premature debonding occurrence (Oehlers and Moran, 1990;Tounsi et al, 2009). The interface shear stresses τ i (z) were obtained by the variation of axial stress and, hence, strain throughout the FRP by the following relationship between two strain gauges at distance Δz i,i+1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%