1988
DOI: 10.1021/ma00188a015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial tension of immiscible polymer blends: temperature and molecular weight dependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
161
2
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
161
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is understood from the fact that mixing of long molecules is less favorable, 13 a well known phenomenon that was reported earlier. 33,34 The results also show that the effect of the low molecular weight phase ͑here this is always the drop phase except for the B3 combination͒ on the value of the interfacial tension ͑the A combinations versus the B combinations͒ is more pronounced than the ratio of the molecular weight. For example, the systems B4 and A3 have the same order of asymmetry but a large difference in the interfacial tension ␥ while the systems B3 and B4 have a big difference in asymmetry but relatively small difference in ␥.…”
Section: A Transient Interfacial Tension and Drop Size Reductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This is understood from the fact that mixing of long molecules is less favorable, 13 a well known phenomenon that was reported earlier. 33,34 The results also show that the effect of the low molecular weight phase ͑here this is always the drop phase except for the B3 combination͒ on the value of the interfacial tension ͑the A combinations versus the B combinations͒ is more pronounced than the ratio of the molecular weight. For example, the systems B4 and A3 have the same order of asymmetry but a large difference in the interfacial tension ␥ while the systems B3 and B4 have a big difference in asymmetry but relatively small difference in ␥.…”
Section: A Transient Interfacial Tension and Drop Size Reductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For instance, simulations [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] have found an entropic enrichment of chain ends at the surface, whereas a reflecting boundary gives a uniform bulk concentration right up to the surface. Furthermore, experiments [9][10][11] have observed a molecular-weight dependence in the surface tension, whereas the Silberberg argument predicts none. Naturally, these effects are due to violations in the assumptions used by Silberberg, namely the presumptions of a step-like concentration profile and the absence of an energy penalty for folding polymer chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find several studies reported on the interfacial properties in terms of interdiffusion at the interface, [22][23][24][25][26] interfacial tension, [27][28][29][30] and interface width, 21,[31][32][33][34] and so forth in polymer blends. The magnitude and behavior of interface width with varying molecular weight, temperature, and film thickness have also been studied using the small angle neutron scattering, neutron reflectometry, 27,28,[33][34][35] small angle X-ray scattering, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), 26 transmission electron microscopy, 30 and so forth with varying success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The magnitude and behavior of interface width with varying molecular weight, temperature, and film thickness have also been studied using the small angle neutron scattering, neutron reflectometry, 27,28,[33][34][35] small angle X-ray scattering, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), 26 transmission electron microscopy, 30 and so forth with varying success. Schnell et al 5 had studied interfaces in blends of polystyrene with either poly (p-methylstyrene) or a statistical copolymer poly(styrene-co-pbromostyrene) using neutron reflection method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%