2021
DOI: 10.15346/hc.v8i2.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacing participation in citizen science projects with conversational agents

Abstract: This paper assesses the use of conversational agents (chatbots) as an interface to enhance communication with participants in citizen science projects. After developing a study of the engagement and motivations to interact with chatbots, we explored our results. We based our analysis on the current needs exposed in citizen science literature to assess the opportunities. We found that chatbots are great communication platforms that can help to engage participants as an all-in-one interface. Chatbots can benefit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interest of practitioners regarding the usage of chatbots to support end-users of services is growing even in susceptible domains, including, for instance, e-government [17,34] and health and rehabilitation [1,16,37]. As suggested by De Filippis et al [11] and Federici et al [16], there is a need for specific and calibrated tools to assess the quality of interaction of chatbots to support the designer during the development and the assessment of such systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest of practitioners regarding the usage of chatbots to support end-users of services is growing even in susceptible domains, including, for instance, e-government [17,34] and health and rehabilitation [1,16,37]. As suggested by De Filippis et al [11] and Federici et al [16], there is a need for specific and calibrated tools to assess the quality of interaction of chatbots to support the designer during the development and the assessment of such systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%