2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference between Coulomb and hadronic scattering in elastic high-energy nucleon collisions

Abstract: The different models of elastic nucleon scattering amplitude will be discussed. Especially, the preference of the more general approach based on eikonal model will be summarized in comparison with the West and Yennie amplitude that played an important role in analyzing corresponding experimental data in the past.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results for a point-like proton [22,23] have been generalized [7] allowing for different slopes for the real and imaginary nuclear amplitudes. A second approach is the form-factor phase, which considers an eikonal treatment for the superposition of amplitudes and a geometrical size with a form factor for the proton structure [20,21,24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results for a point-like proton [22,23] have been generalized [7] allowing for different slopes for the real and imaginary nuclear amplitudes. A second approach is the form-factor phase, which considers an eikonal treatment for the superposition of amplitudes and a geometrical size with a form factor for the proton structure [20,21,24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the different slopes in the analysis of pp elastic scattering has been investigated in the framework of the so-called dispersion relations for slopes [17]. It is important to note that also the CoulombNuclear phase φ(t) depends essentially on the form of the nuclear amplitudes [20,21]. In Appendix A, generalizing previous work [7,[22][23][24], we derive the expression for the phase to be used with the assumed amplitudes written above.…”
Section: Amplitudes and Observables In Forward Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5]- [9]). Then the complete scattering amplitude has been written in the simplified form [5] (for details see Ref.…”
Section: The West and Yennie Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6.3)The integrals that appear in the evaluation of Eq. (6.1) are reduced to the form[18] 1 − e B(t −t)/2 , (6.4) that is solved in terms of exponential integrals[19] asI(B) = E 1 [ B 2 4p 2 + t ] − E i [ − Bt 2 ] + ln [ B 2 4p 2 + t ] + ln [ − Bt 2 ] + 2γ . (6.5)The real and imaginary parts of the phase are then writtenΦ R (s, t) = (−/+) ln − t s + 1 c 2 + 1 c 2 I(B R ) + I(B I ) ,(6.6) and Φ I (s, t) = (−/+) c c 2 + 1 I(B I ) − I(B R ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%