2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.205426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference between resonant and Auger mechanisms for charge-exchange processes near surfaces

Abstract: In this work we solve the dynamics of the Newns-Anderson Hamiltonian supplemented with Auger terms and analyze the case of He ϩ scattered off an Al ͑100͒ surface. The dynamical solution is compared with results of calculations based on much simpler approximations. We prove that resonant and Auger processes can be treated separately and independently in this case and that charge exchange between He and Al proceeds via resonant and Auger exchange of electrons between the promoted molecular orbital of He and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early quantum mechanical calculations gave AN transition rates [1] which were several orders of magnitude smaller than those derived from experimental data [2][3][4]. This discrepancy between theory and experiment, however, could not be removed by more recent and sophisticated calculations focusing on the model system He-Al (simple electronic structure, no contributions from RN [5]) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Early quantum mechanical calculations gave AN transition rates [1] which were several orders of magnitude smaller than those derived from experimental data [2][3][4]. This discrepancy between theory and experiment, however, could not be removed by more recent and sophisticated calculations focusing on the model system He-Al (simple electronic structure, no contributions from RN [5]) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Then, resonant and Auger mechanisms operating at very different regions of distances to the surface can be treated as independent processes [16]. Otherwise, if it is expected interferences, both mechanisms must be included together in the time-dependent evolution of the charge-transfer process [17,18,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we focus our attention in the collision of positive helium ions with a surface of aluminum, a system which has been widely studied but that still presents many interesting interrogates [14,17,18,22,[30][31][32][33][34][35]. This collisional system was initially considered the perfect one for thinking in neutralization by an Auger mechanism [26], due to the relative position of the He ionization potential (24.6 eV) compared with the aluminum work function (4.43 eV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of calculating Auger rates for the deexcitation-neutralization of He ions incident on a metal surface has been widely treated in literature [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. These works analyze different aspects of the Auger process for the general case of unpolarized projectiles and nonmagnetic surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%