2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference competition in a threatened seabird community: A paradox for a successful conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expect this decrease derives from two processes: predation and competition for nesting islets. We assume there will be a strong negative impact of this gull on native species as predation success and competitive abilities are directly linked to body size (Lindstrom 1988;Jonart et al 2007;Oro et al 2009;Schröder et al 2009) and the Caspian gull is much larger than most of the native waterbirds which are potential prey and competitors; (3) Assuming that the large body size of Caspian gull does correspond with its competitive ability, this species will also displace native waterbirds from safe islets located in the center of the reservoir to suboptimal islets located near the shore (i.e., exposed to the predatory activity of native corvids); (4) The increasing population of Caspian gull will lead to increased nest predation on islets visited by this gulls and consequently lower nesting success of native waterbirds at the invaded reservoir as compared with the control one; (5) Over time, the invasion of the Caspian gull will lead to a decline in the population size of small-bodied native predators, namely corvids, as an effect of scramble competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect this decrease derives from two processes: predation and competition for nesting islets. We assume there will be a strong negative impact of this gull on native species as predation success and competitive abilities are directly linked to body size (Lindstrom 1988;Jonart et al 2007;Oro et al 2009;Schröder et al 2009) and the Caspian gull is much larger than most of the native waterbirds which are potential prey and competitors; (3) Assuming that the large body size of Caspian gull does correspond with its competitive ability, this species will also displace native waterbirds from safe islets located in the center of the reservoir to suboptimal islets located near the shore (i.e., exposed to the predatory activity of native corvids); (4) The increasing population of Caspian gull will lead to increased nest predation on islets visited by this gulls and consequently lower nesting success of native waterbirds at the invaded reservoir as compared with the control one; (5) Over time, the invasion of the Caspian gull will lead to a decline in the population size of small-bodied native predators, namely corvids, as an effect of scramble competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by white-tailed eagles Haliaeetus albicilla, Hipfner et al 2012), competition with larger gulls (e.g. Oro et al 2009) or interactions with commercial fisheries (e.g. Frederiksen et al 2004).…”
Section: Retrospective Models Of Population Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, landscape scale AES would benefit also preys of threatened predators of agro-ecosystems (Delibes-Mateos et al, 2009;Fernandez et al, 2006). Nevertheless, it is known that the same agricultural policy may be favourable for some species of conservation concern but detrimental to others , and complex interactions between species, such as interference competition, may often generate conflicts between conservation actions (Oro et al, 2009). Multi-species problems cannot be solved by local studies and single-species experts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%