2019
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/28/8/083403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference effect of photoionization of hydrogen atoms by ultra-short and ultra-fast high-frequency chirped pulses*

Abstract: The photoionization of a hydrogen atom from its ground state with ultra-fast chirped pulses is investigated by numerically solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation within length, velocity, and Kramers–Henneberger gauges. Converged results for all gauges for chirp-free pulses agree with the prediction of dynamic interference for ground state hydrogen atoms predicted recently by Jiang and Burgdörfer [Opt. Express 26, 19921 (2018)]. In addition, we investigated photoelectron spectra of hydrogen atoms by ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After all, it became clear that ground state atoms exhibit dynamic interference, the onset of which can be considered as a signature of atomic stabilization [39]. Over the past years, further theoretical works have demonstrated the importance of dynamic interference from different perspectives [41][42][43][44][45][46][47], though an experimental realization is yet to be presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After all, it became clear that ground state atoms exhibit dynamic interference, the onset of which can be considered as a signature of atomic stabilization [39]. Over the past years, further theoretical works have demonstrated the importance of dynamic interference from different perspectives [41][42][43][44][45][46][47], though an experimental realization is yet to be presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there are minor faults or typos in their models Demekhin et al [13], and Demekhin and Cederbaum [10] and Baghery et al [9] gave contradicting conclusions. However, the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) fully numerical solution corroborated some predictions of dynamic interference in photoemission by powerful extreme ultraviolet (XUV) linearly polarized pulses Guo et al [12]; Jiang and Burgdörfer [7]; Wang et al [14]; Wang and Liu [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…[1][2][3] The representative nonlinear processes include nonsequential double ionization, [4][5][6] high-order harmonic generation (HHG), [7][8][9][10] and dynamic interference (DI) in atomic ionization. [11][12][13][14] To fully understand these strong-field phenomena, not only sophisticated experimental technologies are required, but stateof-the-art numerical methods are also indispensable. The most accurate way to numerically reproduce the experimental data is, of course, performing calculations from first principles, i.e., directly solving the full-dimensional (FD) time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) that strictly describes the timedependent system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%