2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-017-1268-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference in ACTH immunoassay negatively impacts the management of subclinical hypercortisolism

Abstract: Erroneous results associated with analytical interference negatively impacted on clinical decision making in this patient group. This should be considered particularly in conditions such as subclinical hypercortisolism which decisions depend on laboratory investigations mainly. Analytical interference could explain the high variability observed both in field measurements from patients who were expected to have lower corticotropin concentrations and in subclinical hypercortisolism prevalence reported by differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is extremely rare that falsely high or low ACTH levels by a substance in the specimen interfering with the ACTH measurements are confirmed. There have been only 23 such cases, to our knowledge [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] (Table 3). Of the 23 cases, 22 exhibited erroneously elevated ACTH levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is extremely rare that falsely high or low ACTH levels by a substance in the specimen interfering with the ACTH measurements are confirmed. There have been only 23 such cases, to our knowledge [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] (Table 3). Of the 23 cases, 22 exhibited erroneously elevated ACTH levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 23 cases, 22 exhibited erroneously elevated ACTH levels. In some of these reports, the elevated ACTH levels measured on the Immulite platforms were proved to be false, either by pretreatment with heataggregated rabbit IgG, which is known to adsorb assayinterfering heterophilic antibodies [3], or by adoption of different assay platforms [4,[7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, high assay variability should be considered when interpreting low ACTH values (11). Reasons for the assay variability include the pulsatility of ACTH secretion, lack of an international reference standard, as well as technical issues associated with the assay methodology and analysis (e.g., interfering antibodies) (12,13). These issues can contribute to poor assay performance in patients, particularly in those with expected low ACTH levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, negative impact of antibody interference in ACTH measurements was recently reported in adrenal adenomas incidentally detected 21 . As no single routine test is available to identify immunoassay interference, the same authors suggest to ensure collaboration between clinical and laboratory staff to avoid clinical misjudgments.…”
Section: Definition Of Autonomous Acth-independent Hypercortisolismmentioning
confidence: 95%