2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference in free thyroxine immunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the RIA methodology may be overestimating circulating thyroid hormone levels due to interferences with antibodies or other plasma matrices as has been previously reported with thyroid hormone-immunoassay based approaches in clinical settings [20, 22, 55]. For instance, heterophilic antibodies in plasma or serum can promote non-specific binding to anti-T4 and anti-T3 antibodies (and other thyroid-targeted antibodies) producing abnormal values in RIAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that the RIA methodology may be overestimating circulating thyroid hormone levels due to interferences with antibodies or other plasma matrices as has been previously reported with thyroid hormone-immunoassay based approaches in clinical settings [20, 22, 55]. For instance, heterophilic antibodies in plasma or serum can promote non-specific binding to anti-T4 and anti-T3 antibodies (and other thyroid-targeted antibodies) producing abnormal values in RIAs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While sensitive, immunoassay approaches have several weaknesses, including that they can be compromised by a lack of specificity and accuracy due to analytical interferences. Biomolecules may vary across species, cross-react with antibodies, and interfere with assay performance [20–22]. Moreover, RIA methods measure thyroid hormones individually thereby limiting thorough evaluations of interactive thyroid hormone homeostasis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such antibodies commonly affect sandwich ELISAs by cross‐linking the assay capture and detection antibodies, leading to increased signals. In the worst‐case scenario, the outcome is the misinterpretation of test results and misdiagnosis, as has been reported in human medicine …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, due to differences in reagent specificity the concentration of free thyroxine in a given specimen determined with assays from different manufacturers can vary. In addition, heterophile antibody interference with thyroxine quantification that caused clinical confusions has been reported (2,3). To improve the reliability of assay results, mass spectrometry –based analytical protocols have been recently developed (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%