2015
DOI: 10.4283/jmag.2015.20.3.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference Issuses of Radio Frequency Identification Devices in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems and Computed Tomography Scan

Abstract: We evaluated certain issues related to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coupled with the use of active 2.5 GHz radio frequency identification (RFID) tags for patient identification using low field (0.3 T) MRI and computed tomography (CT) scans. We also investigated the performance of the RFID reader located outside the MRI room by considering several factors. A total of ten active RFID tags were exposed to several MRI sequences and X-rays of CT scan. We found that only card type active RFID tags are suitable f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it can analyze material ingredients, dual CT is usually used in various clinical trials. The contrast enhancement of tumors in the kidney area is evaluated by dual CT through categorizing calcium stones and uric acid stones, or distinguishing iodine, which is a primary ingredient of the contrast medium [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Like this, dual CT diagnosed through the material analysis but couldn't complete for various materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it can analyze material ingredients, dual CT is usually used in various clinical trials. The contrast enhancement of tumors in the kidney area is evaluated by dual CT through categorizing calcium stones and uric acid stones, or distinguishing iodine, which is a primary ingredient of the contrast medium [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Like this, dual CT diagnosed through the material analysis but couldn't complete for various materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%