2009
DOI: 10.1080/15321810903084814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference ofDermatophagoides' Specific Immunoglobulins G in the Quantification of Mite's Specific Immunoglobulins E

Abstract: In order to investigate the interference of specific IgG in the quantification of specific IgE, using the ImmunoCAP 250 system, we studied, in parallel, the interference by total adsorption of interferent and the classical method of adding interferent increasingly. Furthermore, to evaluate if the interference is affected by different solid phases, total extract of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and recombinant allergens of Dermatophagoides farinae were used. The results showed a statistical significant interfe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was necessary to minimize the amount of sera required for triplicate measurements of multiple allergenic groups from two concomitant allergen sources. Notoriously, allergen dot immunoblot arrays are generally prone to non‐specific IgE binding as well as non‐specific inhibition of IgE binding by the presence of large quantities of antigen specific IgG in patients sera (34). We did not ascertain the dust mite IgG; however, we did rule out non‐specific IgE binding using ELISA inhibition tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was necessary to minimize the amount of sera required for triplicate measurements of multiple allergenic groups from two concomitant allergen sources. Notoriously, allergen dot immunoblot arrays are generally prone to non‐specific IgE binding as well as non‐specific inhibition of IgE binding by the presence of large quantities of antigen specific IgG in patients sera (34). We did not ascertain the dust mite IgG; however, we did rule out non‐specific IgE binding using ELISA inhibition tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemibeads have a big specific surface area and can provide more binding sites for allergen proteins, including mixed proteins. Consequently, it could reduce the interference of allergen-specific IgG [13], which will appear in the detection of allergen-sIgE [27,28]. In China, the reader of LICA is general equipment and exists in numerous clinical laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strongpoint of our study lies in the fact that ImmunoCAP was used to determine specific IgE. Previous studies usually used allergen dot immunoblot arrays that are known to be prone to nonspecific IgE binding as well as nonspecific inhibition of IgE binding by the presence of large quantities of antigen specific IgG in patients sera [ 17 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%