2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference of sugars in the Coomassie Blue G dye binding assay of proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Arg and Lys are both considered to be ''basic'' amino acids, it is perhaps not surprising that, after the gums were treated at pH 2.8, conformational changes were such that no protein was detected (i.e. no binding) (Banik et al, 2009). KLTA and GCA gums would be expected to bind the dye differently because of the different relative amounts of Arg and Lys and the total levels of protein in each gum (42 and 29 residues/1000, KLTA and GCA, respectively)).…”
Section: Estimation Of Protein ''Content'' In Gum Samples (Coomassie mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since Arg and Lys are both considered to be ''basic'' amino acids, it is perhaps not surprising that, after the gums were treated at pH 2.8, conformational changes were such that no protein was detected (i.e. no binding) (Banik et al, 2009). KLTA and GCA gums would be expected to bind the dye differently because of the different relative amounts of Arg and Lys and the total levels of protein in each gum (42 and 29 residues/1000, KLTA and GCA, respectively)).…”
Section: Estimation Of Protein ''Content'' In Gum Samples (Coomassie mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Coomassie brilliant blue is used in detection and quantification of proteins as the dye has the ability to form complex structures in solution by electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions (Banik, Pal, Ghorai, Chowdhury, & Khowala, 2009). The ''nominal'' protein content is 3% for KLTA and 2% for GCA; however, the calculated results, obtained using BSA as a standard, suggested that the assay is unreliable in terms of the absolute levels of protein present.…”
Section: Estimation Of Protein ''Content'' In Gum Samples (Coomassie mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bradford assay is more commonly used to quantify GRSP than the immunoassay, because the latter is not commercially available. However, it is recognized that other thermostable soil proteins may be extracted and that the Bradford assay is not specific to proteins and thus reacts positively to other compounds such as sugars (Rosier et al , ; Janos et al , ; Banik et al , ; Gillespie et al , ). Furthermore, some studies have indicated that humic substances co‐extracted with soil protein may interfere positively with the colorimetric Bradford assay (Halvorson & Gonzalez, ; Whiffen et al , ; Redmile‐Gordon et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5B). Similarly, Banik and coworkers [17] reported interference of the Ficoll polymer in the BSA determination by the Bradford assay only when present in ion concentrations above 10 wt%. Interference is connected to the ability of the sugars to compete with proteins for binging and sequestering the Coomassie dye.…”
Section: Polymersmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…On the other hand, it was shown in several studies that the Bradford assay may suffer significant interference from some compounds that may be found in protein samples. Interferences caused by the presence of detergents [15], drugs [16], sugars [17], pharmaceutical polymers [18], and some reagents and buffers [13] have already been reported in the literature. However, poor information has been reported about the interference of specific compounds used to form ATPSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%