2006
DOI: 10.1093/njaf/23.2.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference to Hardwood Regeneration in Northeastern North America: Controlling Effects of American Beech, Striped Maple, and Hobblebush

Abstract: When American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.), striped maple (Acer pensylvanicum L.), and hobblebush (Viburnum alnifolium Marsh.) become dense in the understory they interfere with regeneration of other species. This review identifies threshold levels that causeproblems in regenerating desirable hardwoods in northeastern North America, and summarizes methods for controlling the interference in conjunction with a reproduction method cutting. It also forwards some ideas about management based on information in p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to widespread forest health and management concerns related to beech bark disease and associated thickets (Nyland et al. , Wagner et al. , Giencke et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to widespread forest health and management concerns related to beech bark disease and associated thickets (Nyland et al. , Wagner et al. , Giencke et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative interaction (competitive exclusion) generally occurs when multiple species compete for resources (Chase & Leibold 2003). In the forests of north-eastern USA, several factors have been reported as beneficial to beech with respect to competition with sugar maple, red maple and birch, namely: (i) beech is more shade tolerant than the three other studied species (Canham 1989), therefore, small-scale overstorey openings that occur by natural mortality due to beech-bark disease, self-thinning and senescence, and by selection harvest are more beneficial to beech saplings than other species, (ii) unlike the three other species, beech is able to regenerate vegetatively from root suckers, which is often promoted by the beech-bark disease and root injuries during harvesting (Houston 2001;Nyland et al 2006). Beech seedlings originated from suckering have shown a higher rate of growth and survivability than beech seedlings originated from seed (Beaudet & Messier 2008), (iii) beech is a less palatable species for browsers (Tripler et al 2005), and (iv) beech forms an interconnected root system, which effectively generates higher survivability of beech regeneration than other hardwood species (Nyland et al 2006).…”
Section: A S S O C I a T E D F A C T O R S O F T H E D I S T R I B U mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, forest managers will need to incorporate these changes into their long-term management planning. Where beech has become dense in the understorey of northern hardwood forests, no canopy light manipulation strategy by harvesting will succeed in establishing regeneration of desirable species (Nyland et al 2006). Under such situations, regeneration control treatments (e.g.…”
Section: L I M a T E C H A N G E B E E C H E X P A N S I O N A mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations