1999
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-80-7-1807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference with annexin II has no effect on entry of human cytomegalovirus into fibroblast cells.

Abstract: Annexin II has been identified as a human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-binding protein, shown to be a component of purified virions and proposed as a cellular receptor for the virus. In addition, annexin II is capable of associating with the major HCMV envelope glycoprotein, gB (gpUL55). As one approach to examine the role of annexin II in virus entry, a high-titre polyclonal annexin IIspecific antibody was produced and its effects in virus entry and cell-to-cell spread assays were tested. This anti-annexin II serum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AnxA2 was reported to interact with HCMV glycoprotein B (Bold et al, 1996;Pietropaolo and Compton, 1997), and, together with S100A10, to facilitate CMV infection (Derry et al, 2007) probably through enhanced fusion of the virus with the host cell (Raynor et al, 1999). However, this was not confirmed in another study (Pietropaolo and Compton, 1999). AnxA2 on the host cell surface was also implicated in the entry of enterovirus type 71 (EV71), the causative agent of the hand, foot, and mouth disease, to the host cell surface, possibly by binding the viral capsid protein VP1 on the cell surface (Yang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Annexins As Host Cell Surface Receptors For Microbescontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AnxA2 was reported to interact with HCMV glycoprotein B (Bold et al, 1996;Pietropaolo and Compton, 1997), and, together with S100A10, to facilitate CMV infection (Derry et al, 2007) probably through enhanced fusion of the virus with the host cell (Raynor et al, 1999). However, this was not confirmed in another study (Pietropaolo and Compton, 1999). AnxA2 on the host cell surface was also implicated in the entry of enterovirus type 71 (EV71), the causative agent of the hand, foot, and mouth disease, to the host cell surface, possibly by binding the viral capsid protein VP1 on the cell surface (Yang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Annexins As Host Cell Surface Receptors For Microbescontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…AnxA5 is associated with herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 (Loret et al, 2008), HIV-1 (Chertova et al, 2006), VSV (Moerdyk-Schauwecker et al, 2009, Rift Valley fever virus (Nuss et al, 2014), and IAV (Shaw et al, 2008). How and at which stage in the virus infection cycle annexins are acquired remains so far unclear (which Gershom et al, 2012Wright et al, 1994Wright et al, 1995;Pietropaolo and Compton 1997;Pietropaolo and Compton 1999;Raynor et al, 1999;Varnum et al, 2004;Derry et al, 2007 generally holds true for virus-embedded host cell proteins), and the association might simply reflect the nature of the specialized membrane domains where viral assembly and budding take place. Viruses that bud from lipidenriched plasma membrane domains ('rafts') would then incorporate the often raft-associated annexins as part of their host cell membrane-derived viral envelope.…”
Section: Annexins As Host Cell Derived Virulence Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iv) HCMV gB also forms a stable interaction with cellular annexin II (31). At present we favor a role of this interaction in virus maturation and egress (30). Clearly a collection of mutants will be extremely useful in creating a functional map for this essential and multifunctional protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annexin 2 has been associated with numerous virus species. In HCMV, it has been shown to be associated with gB (45), although its role during entry is still controversial (12,44). In the future, it will be important to validate the presence of these proteins and ultimately address their putative function for the virion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%