1997
DOI: 10.1007/s00585-997-0029-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interferometric evidence for the observation of ground backscatter originating behind the CUTLASS coherent HF radars

Abstract: Abstract. Interferometric techniques allow the Super-DARN coherent HF radars to determine the elevation angles of returned backscatter, giving information on the altitude of the scatter volume, in the case of ionospheric backscatter, or the reflection altitude, in the case of ground backscatter. Assumptions have to be made in the determination of elevation angles, including the direction of arrival, or azimuth, of the returned signals, usually taken to be the forward look-direction (north) of the radars, speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
143
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…equatorward of ) the radars as a consequence of a rear lobe in the antenna patterns and favourable propagation conditions at mid latitudes. Interferometer information can distinguish between front and rear backscatter as backscatter from in front of the radars has elevation angles which tend to decrease with increasing range (consistent with HF propagation characteristics) and backscatter from behind the radars has elevation angles which increase with range (due to 2p ambiguities in determining the phase delay, Milan et al, 1997). Thus, comparing elevation angle occurrence distributions from di erent ranges it is possible to identify two populations of observations, which increase and decrease in elevation angle with increasing range.…”
Section: Ground Backscattermentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…equatorward of ) the radars as a consequence of a rear lobe in the antenna patterns and favourable propagation conditions at mid latitudes. Interferometer information can distinguish between front and rear backscatter as backscatter from in front of the radars has elevation angles which tend to decrease with increasing range (consistent with HF propagation characteristics) and backscatter from behind the radars has elevation angles which increase with range (due to 2p ambiguities in determining the phase delay, Milan et al, 1997). Thus, comparing elevation angle occurrence distributions from di erent ranges it is possible to identify two populations of observations, which increase and decrease in elevation angle with increasing range.…”
Section: Ground Backscattermentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A previous study of the interferometer results of the CUTLASS radars (Milan et al, 1997) indicated that a signi®cant proportion of ground backscatter originates behind (i.e. equatorward of ) the radars as a consequence of a rear lobe in the antenna patterns and favourable propagation conditions at mid latitudes.…”
Section: Ground Backscattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Milan and identified population vi echoes that appeared to have similar characteristics to population i but with a reversed Doppler shift; these are now understood to be population i echoes that have been observed in the rear field-of-view of the radar (Milan et al 1997) when the electrojet is located at extremely low latitudes.…”
Section: E-region Ionospheric Irregularitiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…2, and the latest starting around 15:00 UT, indicate that these waves were travelling away from the radar. This apparent anomaly was resolved by Milan et al (1997) who proposed that when the forward-directed beams are looking at the ionosphere when it is still in darkness, the backward-looking side lobes are able to receive signals propagating via the sunlit ionosphere at lower latitudes. The radar is su ciently sensitive to detect these signals above the noise threshold.…”
Section: The Cutlass Iceland and Finland Radarsmentioning
confidence: 99%