2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.889359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interferometric measurement of profile deviations of large precision mirrors

Abstract: In numerous interferometric applications of nanopositioning and nanomeasuring technology, plane mirrors are used as flatness or straightness standards for the movement of a positioning device. During this process, the shape deviations of the mirrors used lead to systematic errors of the position measurements, which can be corrected in later applications if known. Most often the effective shape deviations are described sufficiently well by profile deviations along a profile line which is fixed by the movement o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental coherence of the basic uncertainty analyses of the INP has already been published in [5]. Meanwhile the thermal stabilization measures, explained in [7], reduced the combined standard uncertainty of the INP. Again, as presented in this paper, we were able to make further improvements by greatly reducing two major systematic errors: the uncertainty of the straightness standard was reduced from 3.6 nm to 0.4 nm and the demodulation errors of the interferometer signals from 1.2 nm to 0.5 nm.…”
Section: Combined Standard Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fundamental coherence of the basic uncertainty analyses of the INP has already been published in [5]. Meanwhile the thermal stabilization measures, explained in [7], reduced the combined standard uncertainty of the INP. Again, as presented in this paper, we were able to make further improvements by greatly reducing two major systematic errors: the uncertainty of the straightness standard was reduced from 3.6 nm to 0.4 nm and the demodulation errors of the interferometer signals from 1.2 nm to 0.5 nm.…”
Section: Combined Standard Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The interferometric nanoprofilometer (INP), developed at the Institute of Process Measurement and Sensor Technology at the Ilmenau University of Technology, is a precision device to measure profile deviations of plane mirrors with a profile length of up to 250 mm at the nanometre scale. The design and functionality of the interferometric nanoprofilometer has been extensively introduced elsewhere [5,7]. In this paper we only give a short overview of the design, instead concentrating on Interferometer head…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%