I nduced abortion is a common procedure performed among women of reproductive age. 1 Although it is technically a simple and safe procedure, complications with different degrees of severity can occur following induced abortion. 2-6 Physician procedure volume is known to be inversely related to the risk of complications after complex procedures, such as cancer, cardiac and pelvic surgery. 7,8 In contrast to these complex higher-risk surgeries, surgically induced abortion is a low-risk, less technically demanding procedure, performed mostly among relatively healthy women. In addition, given that most induced abortions are performed for reasons other than a maternal illness or fetal anomaly, such as a mistimed pregnancy or financial burden, 9,10 this underscores the expectation that the procedure carries little or no risk of an adverse outcome for women. To our knowledge, the influence of physician procedure volume on patient outcomes after induced abortion is not known. Accordingly , we aimed to examine the relation between physicians' volume of surgically induced abortion procedures and women's risk of adverse events after surgically induced abortion. Methods Study setting We conducted a population-based cohort study using administrative health data for the province of Ontario, Canada, where health care, including access to induced abortion services, is publicly funded. Induced abortions are performed in hospitals, outpatient clinics and health care centres. 11 In recent years, induced abortions have been increasingly provided at free-standing abortion clinics located almost exclusively in large urban centres. 12 Up to December 2016, at least 95% of induced abortions in the province were done as a sur gic al procedure. 3 An oral preparation that combines mifepristone and RESEARCH HEALTH SERVICES