2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00585.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergenerational Ambivalence: Further Steps in Theory and Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
0
51

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
125
0
51
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is based on the concept of structured ambivalence, which has been discussed as a bridging concept between individual behaviour and social context (Bengtson et al 2002;Connidis and McMullin 2002a, b;Luescher 2002). We not only provide the first example of how to measure structured ambivalence in a cross-cultural framework, but also new insights into the relation between grandchild care and QoL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is based on the concept of structured ambivalence, which has been discussed as a bridging concept between individual behaviour and social context (Bengtson et al 2002;Connidis and McMullin 2002a, b;Luescher 2002). We not only provide the first example of how to measure structured ambivalence in a cross-cultural framework, but also new insights into the relation between grandchild care and QoL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been tied to ensuing feelings of ambivalence (Connidis & McMullin, 2002;Lucas, 2009;Luscher, 2004;Sennett & Cobb, 1972), as individuals struggle with liminal class identities. For example, Lubrano (2004) interviewed more than 100 white-collar professionals from blue-collar families.…”
Section: Social Reproduction and Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of ambivalence serves a significant sensitizing and linking function in stressing the contradictory social expectations of different social groups (e.g., the old and the young) and demands of social institutions (e.g., work and family)-sociological or structural ambivalence-and the mixed emotions of close relationships-psychological ambivalence (Connidis, 2010(Connidis, , 2012Connidis & McMullin, 2002a, 2002bLüscher, 2002Lüscher, , 2004Lüscher & Pillemer, 1998). When we consider our own close family relationships, we have a strong intuitive and experiential understanding of their inherent paradoxes.…”
Section: Age Relations and Intergenerational Tiesmentioning
confidence: 99%