“…Additionally, 6 studies combined host cultural gap higher with host cultural gap lower and/or native cultural gap higher with native cultural gap lower to test whether a gap in the host culture differs from a gap in the native culture [Elder, Broyles, Brennan, Zuniga de Nuncio, & Nader, 2005;Martinez, 2006;Phinney & Ong, 2002;Phinney & Veddar, 2006;Sam & Virta, 2003 Fa mily member respondent refers to the family member, in addition to the child/adolescent participant, who reported their acculturation level; number indicates the sample size of the study; cultural dimension refers to whether the measure takes a unidimensional or bidimensional approach and the culture of acculturation being measured (host culture vs. native culture); cultural domain refers to the particular aspects of acculturation that are being measured and whether the measure combines all domains into a global index of acculturation, independently examines multiple domains, or measures a single domain; calculation refers to how the acculturation gap was Expanding the Acculturation Gap-Distress Model 323 Human Development 2010;53:313-340 Chen, 1999]. Finally, 2 studies examined only 1 of the 4 types of gaps [Juang, Syed, & Takagi, 2007;Zhou, 2001]. …”