Intergroup Conflict 2020

Halevy, Nir; Cohen, Taya R.

doi:10.1111/ncmr.12148

Cited by 16 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 120 publications

(132 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The project literature helps us understand the implications of this attention perspective within and across teams on individual and team behavior. This literature concedes that projects that focus on their sole effectiveness through pursuing their independent goals are often those that succeed (Martinsuo, 2013), because allegiances and misalignment of goals across teams may limit the effectiveness of MTM on any single project (Halevy & Cohen, 2019; Mesmer-Magnus, Carter, Asencio, & DeChurch, 2016). For example, a recent study demonstrated that when developers discuss multiple projects simultaneously, the average amount of time to resolve an issue declines; however, this discussion-switching can hurt the resolution time of a single project (Hu, Wang, Chang, Yin, & Zhang, 2018).…”

Section: Outcomes Of Mtmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple Team Membership: An Integrative Review

Margolis

2019

Small Group Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With many employees operating in a multiteam environment, multiple team membership (MTM) has become a critical topic across a number of disciplines. Although MTM research is often regarded as being in its beginning stages, there has been a recent uptick of research. An integration of the literature at this phase allows scholars to see the most pressing challenges and begin to identify general insights to move research forward effectively. Accordingly, this review contributes to the literature through drawing meaningful connections regarding MTM between disciplines and providing nascent opportunities for future research. The final review includes 44 articles that directly examine MTM. These articles are supplemented by the project and management literatures to elaborate upon the theoretical bases and findings of these articles.

show abstract

Section: Outcomes Of Mtmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple Team Membership: An Integrative Review

Margolis

2019

Small Group Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Social media users tend to interact with like-minded people through which group formation takes shape (Bennett & Segerberg, 2011), but social media platforms also provide a space for people from different backgrounds to encounter one another (Del Vicario et al, 2016). In cases of contentious political issues, such encounters can lead to intergroup conflict: an antagonistic pattern of interaction between online communities (Halevy & Cohen, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Emotions to Frame Issues and Identities in Conflict: Farmer Movements on Social Media

Stevens

Aarts

Dewulf

2020

Negotiation Conflict Man Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Polarization and group formation processes on social media networks have received ample academic attention, but few studies have looked into the discursive interactions on social media through which intergroup conflicts develop. In this comparative case study, we analyzed two social media conflicts between farmers and animal right advocates to understand how conflicts establish, escalate, and return dormant through issue and identity framing and the discursive use of emotions. The results show that the two groups used the same set of frames throughout the three phases. We identify this as a symmetric conflict framing repertoire. The groups both use a dominant moral frame (animal welfare is of absolute value), but express distinct views on policy solutions. This triggers a contestation of credibility (who knows best and who cares most for animals) in which the two groups use the same set of issue and identity frames to directly oppose each other. The binary opposition is initially established through issue framing but escalates into an identity conflict that involves group labeling and blaming. The discursive use of emotion reinforces this escalation in two ways. First, it reinforces a vicious cycle in the contestation of credibility: While emotions are implicitly used to frame oneself as caring and trustworthy, emotion is explicitly used to frame the other party as deceptive and irrational. Second, disputants use collective emotions as a response to the other group's offensive actions (blaming) and as a justification of one's own collective actions. We discuss how this conflict differs from previously studied conflicts to provide plausible explanations for these findings.

show abstract

“…In the fourth paper, Nir Halevy and Taya Cohen identify key pressing research questions and challenges for the field of intergroup conflict. The first question the authors pose is “When and why do people engage in, and publicly display, blatant forms of intergroup hostility?” They identify some antecedents of intergroup hostility that have achieved ample attention in the literature, such as relative deprivation, direct threats to group interests, and perceived threats.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Big Questions for Negotiation and Culture Research

Gelfand

Brett

2019

Negotiation Conflict Man Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On April 12, 2018, at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, we hosted a conference on the frontiers of culture and negotiation research. The conference brought together scholars from two vibrant areas of research-cultural psychology and negotiation-in order to stimulate future research at the intersection of culture and negotiation.For years, these two areas remained isolated from each other: Negotiation research, which developed in the West, tended to ignore culture. Culture research, while global in its scope, tended to ignore negotiation. Back in 2003, we hosted a conference, again at Northwestern, to begin to integrate theory, research, and practice in both fields. We asked pairs of scholars from both culture and negotiation research to write on a topic relevant to both, including basic psychological processes (e.g., cognition, motivation and emotion), the social process (e.g., communication, conflict, and disputing) and the social context (e.g., intergroup relationships, third parties, justice, technology, and social dilemmas) which culminated in the Handbook of Negotiation and Culture (Stanford University Press). Our goals in that volume were to compile an up-to-date review of current knowledge of negotiation, to challenge negotiation theorists to more inclusive of all humankind, and to encourage cultural theorists to provide an explanation for patterns of thought and action in an important area of social interaction. The authors identified numerous knowledge lacuna-opportunities for research for decades to come-and also identified the limits of the Western culture-based findings (Figure 1).

show abstract

Intergroup Conflict 2020

Cited by 16 publications

References 120 publications

Multiple Team Membership: An Integrative Review

Multiple Team Membership: An Integrative Review

Using Emotions to Frame Issues and Identities in Conflict: Farmer Movements on Social Media

Big Questions for Negotiation and Culture Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About