2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergroup dissimilarity predicts physiological synchrony and affiliation in intergroup interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Genthner et al ( 1975 ) found that highly prejudiced White participants behaved more aggressively toward a Black confederate when they were told that their attitudes were highly similar compared to dissimilar to the confederate. Likewise, in contexts when racism is openly endorsed by authorities (Crandall et al, 2018 ), even manipulations of interpersonal similarity may be associated with intergroup processes, backfire, and decrease affiliative actions such as attending to the eyes of outgroups (Danyluck & Page-Gould, 2018 , 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Genthner et al ( 1975 ) found that highly prejudiced White participants behaved more aggressively toward a Black confederate when they were told that their attitudes were highly similar compared to dissimilar to the confederate. Likewise, in contexts when racism is openly endorsed by authorities (Crandall et al, 2018 ), even manipulations of interpersonal similarity may be associated with intergroup processes, backfire, and decrease affiliative actions such as attending to the eyes of outgroups (Danyluck & Page-Gould, 2018 , 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction between interpersonal (between two individuals) similarity and intergroup (between two groups) similarity, however, is sometimes blurred in this theorizing (Dovidio et al, 2000 ). Recent research indicates that intergroup similarity has a complex and inconsistent relationship with liking and positive outcomes for the outgroup (Brown & Abrams, 1986 ; Brown & Lopez, 2001 ; Danyluck & Page-Gould, 2018 , 2019 ; Diehl, 1988 ; Roccas & Schwartz, 1993 ). Interpersonal similarity, alternatively, as proposed by the original contact theory and as suggested by our results, has the potential to reduce bias between members of distinct social categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maintaining close friendships is 1 We use the term linkage to refer to the level of covariation between two people in their moment-to-moment emotional responses (i.e., physiology or behavior). Other work refers to similar phenomenacovariation of emotional responses either between or within peopleas response coherence (Mauss et al, 2005), response system coherence (Ekman, 1992), organization of response components (Frijda, Ortony, Sonnemans, & Clore, 1992;Scherer, 1984;Witherington, Campos, & Hertenstein, 2001), response component syndromes (Averill, 1980;Reisenzein, 2000), concordance (Nesse et al, 1985;Wilhelm & Roth, 2001), organization of response tendencies (Lazarus, 1991;Levenson, 1994), synchrony (Danyluck & Page-Gould, 2018), and coregulation (Butler & Randall, 2013;Timmons et al, 2015). critical to psychological and physical health (Holt-Lunstad, Robles, & Sbarra, 2017) rendering the examination of these aims within the context of friendships particularly vital.…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While every study cannot explicitly prove whether observed physiological synchrony is the result of an interpersonal process, efforts to rule out alternative explanations (e.g., two people processing the same stimulus in parallel, genetic inheritance of stress reactivity profiles) will be invaluable for understanding the conditions under which true, interpersonal physiological synchrony is observed. It is also possible to experimentally manipulate behavioral synchrony and examine resulting changes in physiological synchrony, as has been done with unfamiliar adult pairs (Danyluck & Page-Gould, 2018; Hove & Risen, 2009; Hu et al, 2017; Szymanski, Müller, Brick, von Oertzen, & Lindenberger, 2017). In addition, while a discussion of diurnal physiological synchrony was outside the scope of this review, diurnal synchrony may be uniquely useful to understanding dyadic coregulation processes, especially for systems that operate over longer timescales and have systematic diurnal patterns (e.g., HPA activity; Pratt et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%