Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.

Mackie, Diane M.; Devos, Thierry; Smith, Eliot R.

doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602

Cited by 1,364 publications

(1,621 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,493

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, our integrative model fit the data much better under in-group than under out-group disadvantaged conditions. These results lend support for our integrative approach in the sense that in-group disadvantage increased social identity salience, which is in line with IET's proposal that social identity salience sets the stage for group-based emotions, such as group-based anger, to occur (Mackie et al, 2000;E. R. Smith, 1993).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

“…Indeed, our predictive model including the group efficacy pathway consistently fit better and explained more variance than an alternative model in which the group efficacy pathway to collective action was omitted. In other words, this integrative model adds value to models based on an intergroup emotion analysis alone (i.e., IET; Mackie et al, 2000;E. R. Smith, 1993), as well as providing more explanatory power than approaches focusing primarily on collective disadvantage and procedural unfairness associated with classic intergroup theories (e.g., SIT, RDT).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is! Explaining Collective Action Tendencies Through Group-Based Anger and Group Efficacy.

Zomeren

Spears

Fischer

et al. 2004

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

908

1,122

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Insights from appraisal theories of emotion are used to integrate elements of theories on collective action. Three experiments with disadvantaged groups systematically manipulated procedural fairness (Study 1), emotional social support (Study 2), and instrumental social support (Study 3) to examine their effects on collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Results of structural equation modeling showed that procedural fairness and emotional social support affected the group-based anger pathway (reflecting emotion-focused coping), whereas instrumental social support affected the group efficacy pathway (reflecting problem-focused coping), constituting 2 distinct pathways to collective action tendencies. Analyses of the means suggest that collective action tendencies become stronger the more fellow group members "put their money where their mouth is." The authors discuss how their dual pathway model integrates and extends elements of current approaches to collective action.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is! Explaining Collective Action Tendencies Through Group-Based Anger and Group Efficacy.

Zomeren

Spears

Fischer

et al. 2004

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

908

1,122

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mackie et al (2000) found that intergroup anger was distinct from intergroup fear, and the tendency to take action against the outgroup was distinct from the tendency to move away from the out-group. Lerner and Keltner (2001) found that anger (trait and state) related to favorable expectations, whereas fear related to unfavorable expectations.…”

Section: Personality Psychopathology and Perceptionsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications.

Carver¹,

Harmon‐Jones²

2009

Psychological Bulletin

1,404

1,165

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors review a range of evidence concerning the motivational underpinnings of anger as an affect, with particular reference to the relationship between anger and anxiety or fear. The evidence supports the view that anger relates to an appetitive or approach motivational system, whereas anxiety relates to an aversive or avoidance motivational system. This evidence appears to have 2 implications. One implication concerns the nature of anterior cortical asymmetry effects. The evidence suggests that such asymmetry reflects direction of motivational engagement (approach vs. withdrawal) rather than affective valence. The other implication concerns the idea that affects form a purely positive dimension and a purely negative dimension, which reflect the operation of appetitive and aversive motivational systems, respectively. The evidence reviewed does not support that view. The evidence is, however, consistent with a discrete-emotions view (which does not rely on dimensionality) and with an alternative dimensional approach.Keywords: anger, approach, appetitive system, avoidance, threat system Recent years have seen a surge of interest in emotional experience (e.g., Barrett, Niedenthal, & Winkielman, 2005;Dalgleish & Power, 1999;Davidson, Scherer, & Goldsmith, 2003;Frijda, 2007; Lane & Nadel, 2000;Lewis & Haviland-Jones, 2000;Ortony, Clore, & Collins, 1988;Panksepp, 1998; Rottenberg & Johnson, 2007; Scherer, Schorr, & Johnstone, 2001). Views of emotion vary considerably, in several respects. As one example, some people view emotions as a set of distinct modular entities, often considered basic emotions (e.g., Ekman, 1992;Izard, 1991;Izard & Ackerman, 2000;Levenson, 1994Levenson, , 1999Panksepp, 1998;Roseman, 1991). Others hold that affects are best understood by reference to underlying dimensions (e.g., Barrett, 2006;Cacioppo, Gardner, & Berntson, 1999;Carver & Scheier, 1998;Davidson, 1998;Gray, 1994a;Lang, Bradley, & Cuthbert, 1992Russell, 2003;Russell & Carroll, 1999a, 1999bWatson, Wiese, Vaidya, & Tellegen, 1999;Yik, Russell, & Barrett, 1999). AngerThis article focuses on one specific affect-anger. Specifically, it addresses the relationship of this affect to broad motivational tendencies of approach and avoidance, and it considers implications of that relationship for two areas of thought and research. We begin with a few words about definitions.Sometimes the terms affect, feeling, and emotion are treated as interchangeable (e.g., Isen, 2000); sometimes they are distinguished from each other (e.g., Fredrickson, 2001;. Affect is generally used to imply a hedonic experience, a sense of valence, a subjective sense of positivity or negativity arising from an event. When many use the word emotion, it is with that sense in mind. As Frijda (2000) put it, "For many theorists, the essence of emotion is feeling, and notably 'affect,' here used in the sense of a feeling of pleasure or pain . . . ." (p. 63). As Ortony et al. (1988) put it, emotions are ". . valenced reactions to events, agents, or objects . ." (p. 13). T...

show abstract

“…The questionnaire was based on behavior reported by people with changes in appearance, considering that certain types of emotions give space to specific behaviors that may be offensive or not, i.e., the behavioral manifestation of stigma may differ depending on the type of emotion caused (14) . Stigmatizing behaviors that underlie the construction of the questionnaire were identified by the authors in the literature review and were organized into six categories: improper attention and stare, avoidance behavior, confuse behavior, rude and provocative behavior, bullying and external pressure to change their appearance (12) .…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation and cultural adaptation of the Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire for burn victims in Brazil

Freitas¹,

Caltran²,

Dantas³

et al. 2014

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This methodological study aimed to describe the process of translation and cultural adaptation of the Perceived stigmatization Questionnaire (PSQ) and analyze the internal consistency of the items in the step of pre-testing. The PSQ was developed to evaluate the perception of stigmatizing behaviors of burn victims. The adaptation process was carried out from August 2012 to February 2013, comprising the steps outlined in the literature. As part of this process, the pre-test with 30 adult burn victims was held. All participants at this step reported to understand the instrument items and the scale of responses. There were no suggestions or changes in the tested version. The value of Cronbach’s alpha at pre-test was 0.87. The contribution of this study is to describe the operation of each of the steps of this methodological process and show the internal consistency of the items in the pre-test.

show abstract

Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.

Cited by 1,364 publications

References 48 publications

Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is! Explaining Collective Action Tendencies Through Group-Based Anger and Group Efficacy.

Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is! Explaining Collective Action Tendencies Through Group-Based Anger and Group Efficacy.

Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications.

Translation and cultural adaptation of the Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire for burn victims in Brazil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About