2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2010.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interharmonics analysis of power signals with fundamental frequency deviation using Kalman filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Grouping of proposed methodologies parametric/model-based methods spectral model optimisation with high-resolution windowing [15] general noise resilient technique based on MPM [16] robust and adaptive detection in active distribution networks [17] SW-ESPRIT [18] Prony's method [19,20] linear LS method and SVD [21] AR model and Burg algorithm [22] Kalman filtering [23,24] Pisarenko's method [25] min-norm method [26] multiple signal classification [24] subspace-based methods [24] slow sampling and modified gradient search algorithm [27] non-parametric/DFT-based advanced methods DP technique [28] time-domain averaging and DF [29] DFT-based recursive group-harmonic energy distribution [30] interpolating windowed FFT algorithm [31] adaptive window width for interharmonic estimation [32] iterative weighted average phasor method [32] leakage estimation methods [33] synthetic resampling method [34] self-tuning algorithm for harmonic and interharmonic estimations [35] spectral correction method [36] statistical techniques single-channel ICA [37,38] maximum-likelihood estimators [39] SVM algorithm [40] AR model and Burg algorithm [22] machine learning methods SVM algorithm [40] artificial neural network [41,42] generalised optimisation methods PSO [43] FB-based methods filter-based methods with PLL for synchronisation • PLL-based multirate structure for interharmonic estimation [44] • Digital PLL and notch filter for interharmonic estimation…”
Section: Table 1 Grouping Of Proposed Interharmonic Analysis Methods mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grouping of proposed methodologies parametric/model-based methods spectral model optimisation with high-resolution windowing [15] general noise resilient technique based on MPM [16] robust and adaptive detection in active distribution networks [17] SW-ESPRIT [18] Prony's method [19,20] linear LS method and SVD [21] AR model and Burg algorithm [22] Kalman filtering [23,24] Pisarenko's method [25] min-norm method [26] multiple signal classification [24] subspace-based methods [24] slow sampling and modified gradient search algorithm [27] non-parametric/DFT-based advanced methods DP technique [28] time-domain averaging and DF [29] DFT-based recursive group-harmonic energy distribution [30] interpolating windowed FFT algorithm [31] adaptive window width for interharmonic estimation [32] iterative weighted average phasor method [32] leakage estimation methods [33] synthetic resampling method [34] self-tuning algorithm for harmonic and interharmonic estimations [35] spectral correction method [36] statistical techniques single-channel ICA [37,38] maximum-likelihood estimators [39] SVM algorithm [40] AR model and Burg algorithm [22] machine learning methods SVM algorithm [40] artificial neural network [41,42] generalised optimisation methods PSO [43] FB-based methods filter-based methods with PLL for synchronisation • PLL-based multirate structure for interharmonic estimation [44] • Digital PLL and notch filter for interharmonic estimation…”
Section: Table 1 Grouping Of Proposed Interharmonic Analysis Methods mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variations of the fundamental or industrial frequencies can occur due to disturbances, its subsequent transients, the dramatic real power fluctuations of loads or the increasing integration of intermittent-renewable distributed generation [8]. These can lead to errors in current methodologies.…”
Section: Considerations On Signal Processing For Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental or industrial frequency can vary due to various reasons such as disturbances, subsequent transients or the dramatic real power fluctuations of loads and the increasing integration of intermittent-renewable distributed generation [14] Due to non-uniformity of the filters' bandwidth, variation in the fundamental frequency leads to errors in splitting frequencies by using multi-resolution analyses. To illustrate this fact a voltage signal with fundamental amplitude of 1 pu and 7th harmonic of amplitude 0.5 pu with 1 Hz fundamental frequency variation were used.…”
Section: B Fundamental Frequency Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%