“…The detection of some arylamines in the urine of nonsmoking controls may be attributable to an environmental background level of arylamines-for example from combustion processes In addition, aromatic amines may enter the body from dyestuffs in cosmetics and clothing and from passive smoking. The occupationally exposed workers had higher levels of urinary aniline and 4-chloroaniline concentrations by comparison with the control group (Tables 1, 5); these two arylamines were the main exposure in all workers The mean urinary levels of aniline, p-toluidine, 4-chloro-o-toluidine, and 2-naphthylamine were higher in nonsmoking occupationally exposed workers than in nonsmoking controls By contrast, the mean urinary levels of o-toluidine, p-toluidine, 4-chloro-o-toluidine, and 4-methyl-1,3-phenylenediamine were higher in smoking controls than in smoking workers This may be due to different amounts of smoking in both groups These results indicate that smoking habits should be taken into account if the urinary excretion of arylamines is used in The use of hemoglobin adducts as an indicator of exposure to aromatic amines in biomonitoring has been recommended: hemoglobin adducts persist for the whole life of the erythrocytes, so that low chronic exposures can be detected (Bolt et al 1985 ;Lewalter und Korallus 1985Neumann 1984Neumann , 1991Skipper and Tannenbaum 1990) In our investigation three arylamine hemoglobin adducts were determined in occupationally exposed workers The mean 4-aminodiphenyl hemoglobin adduct level was higher in smokers than in nonsmokers, which may be an effect of the smoking habits Other studies have demonstrated that the hemoglobin adduct concentrations of o-toluidine, p-toluidine, 2-naphthylamine, and 3 and 4-aminodiphenyl are elevated in smokers Coghlin et al 1991 ;Falter et al 1994 ;Mac Lure et al 1989 ;Skipper et al 1988 ;Vineis and Ronco 1992 ;Yu et al 1994) The mean hemoglobin adduct levels of aniline and 4-chloroaniline were higher in the nonsmoking group of occupationally exposed workers than in the smoking workers (difference not significant). Unfortunately, we have no air concentrations of the aromatic amines at the workplace and no estimation of dermal contamination and uptake; therefore, we cannot correlate the results of our biomonitoring methods with individual exposure data We found good correlations between urinary concentrations and hemoglobin adduct levels in the case of aniline and absence of correlations in the case of 4-chloroaniline; this may be a consequence of the much higher hemoglobin binding index of chloroaniline (Neumann et al 1993 ;Sabbioni 1993).…”