Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interindividual Variation in Self-perceived Oral Proficiency of English L2 Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This negative relationship between SLA and self-perceived L2 competence has been repeatedly reported in foreign and second language anxiety research (e.g., Dewaele, 2008;Donovan and MacIntyre, 2005). Although self-perceived L2 competence correlates highly with actual competence (Noels and Clement, 1996), it is important to recognize the potential of SLA to bias self-perceived competence in a negative direction.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Slamentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This negative relationship between SLA and self-perceived L2 competence has been repeatedly reported in foreign and second language anxiety research (e.g., Dewaele, 2008;Donovan and MacIntyre, 2005). Although self-perceived L2 competence correlates highly with actual competence (Noels and Clement, 1996), it is important to recognize the potential of SLA to bias self-perceived competence in a negative direction.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Slamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…One obvious factor affecting FSL/SLA is an individual's selfperceived competence in speaking their L2 (Donovan and MacIntyre, 2005;Dewaele, 2008), which tends to be a good predictor of actual proficiency (MacIntyre, et al, 1997;Noels and Clement, 1996). There is also evidence that FLA/SLA is related to age, with anxiety diminishing as age increases (Onwuegbuzie, Bailey, and Daley, 1999).…”
Section: Individual Differences In Foreign and Second Language Anxietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-perceived oral proficiency. The questionnaire contained four items related to selfperceived proficiency in speaking, comprehending, reading and writing in the different languages (for a discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of this approach, see Dewaele, 2007a). The question was formulated as follows: On a scale from 1 (least proficient) to 5 (fully fluent) how do you rate yourself in speaking the L2?…”
Section: Network Of Interlocutorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of AoA was typically stronger in more stressful situations such as speaking on the phone or speaking in public. Dewaele (2007a) analysed variation in self-perceived oral communicative competence of 475 English L2 users grouped in three AoA groups and found that early starters rated their oral communicative competence in English significantly more highly than participants who started learning English later. Dewaele (2007b) looked at the effect of a range of independent variables, including AoA, on the frequency of a particular language choice for mental calculation in the population of 1454 bi-and multilinguals reported earlier.…”
Section: Literature Review: Aoa and Affective Variables Among Biand Mmentioning
confidence: 99%