2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interior degenerate/singular parabolic equations in nondivergence form: well-posedness and Carleman estimates

Abstract: We consider non smooth general degenerate/singular parabolic equations in non\ud divergence form with degeneracy and singularity occurring in the interior of the spatial\ud domain, in presence of Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions. In particular, we\ud consider well posedness of the problem and then we prove Carleman estimates for the\ud associated adjoint problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using again the fact that ξ x is supported in [−β 1 , −λ 1 ]∪[λ 1 ,β 1 ]∪[λ 2 ,λ 2 ]∪[2−λ 2 , 2−λ 2 ] and the boundedness ofã ′ (far away from x 0 in the weakly degenerate case, see (4.2), and since a ∈ W 1,∞ (−1, 2) in the strongly degenerate one), it follows, by the Caccioppoli's inequality for the nondegenerate case (see, e.g., [18,Remark 7]).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using again the fact that ξ x is supported in [−β 1 , −λ 1 ]∪[λ 1 ,β 1 ]∪[λ 2 ,λ 2 ]∪[2−λ 2 , 2−λ 2 ] and the boundedness ofã ′ (far away from x 0 in the weakly degenerate case, see (4.2), and since a ∈ W 1,∞ (−1, 2) in the strongly degenerate one), it follows, by the Caccioppoli's inequality for the nondegenerate case (see, e.g., [18,Remark 7]).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, this result generalizes the one obtained in [29] or [30]: in fact, if λ = 0 (that is, if we consider the purely degenerate case), we recover the main contributions therein. See also [25] for the problem in non divergence form for both Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This necessary condition that ensures the well posedness of (1.1) makes it not null controllable (see [31] for the interior degeneracy). For this reason, in this paper as in [13], [14], [26], [27] or [31], we prove null controllability for (1.1) without deducing it by the previous results for the problem in divergence form. Therefore, this paper complements [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%