2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-553x.2012.01403.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlaboratory comparison of current high‐performance methods for HbA2

Abstract: A poor alignment of routine methods for HbA(2) measurement was found. The need of a better standardization of HbA(2) measurement procedures was underlined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, quite a few cases may present with borderline levels of HbA 2 , no HbF, and indecisive CBC parameters. Then HbA 2 determination can be a source of errors 24 and quite a few inter-laboratory variations 25 and technical pitfalls 26 may cause misdiagnosis when HbA 2 is considered to be a decisive cut off parameter. These gray area cases must be very carefully examined, especially when they are part of a risk assessment with a partner carrier of a plain β thalassemia mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, quite a few cases may present with borderline levels of HbA 2 , no HbF, and indecisive CBC parameters. Then HbA 2 determination can be a source of errors 24 and quite a few inter-laboratory variations 25 and technical pitfalls 26 may cause misdiagnosis when HbA 2 is considered to be a decisive cut off parameter. These gray area cases must be very carefully examined, especially when they are part of a risk assessment with a partner carrier of a plain β thalassemia mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Factors such as co-elutions, integration modes, calibrations, different columns, different buffers, different temperatures, different sample quality and concentrations have to be considered. These and other factors contribute to an inevitable variety of artifact that makes the use of normal cutoff intervals very risky when the HbA 2 value alone is used to confirm or exclude a possible b-thalassemia trait.…”
Section: Measuring Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this regard, data obtained in a large external quality assessment scheme [UK NEQAS (H)] and results from a recent inter-laboratory study showed a significant bias between different routine methods for HbA 2 measurement [6,7] . However, it is rather difficult to evaluate the actual analytical quality of HbA 2 testing since at present there is no reference measurement procedure approved for this analyte and no defined specifications for allowable analytical bias and imprecision have been defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%