2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00372.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlaboratory reproducibility of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a national survey

Abstract: The present study shows that the AGC category is not easily reproducible. The data confirmed the importance, in a screening scenario, of AGC/AIS diagnoses, but also presented difficulties in differentiating between the two diagnoses. In addition to the results obtained from the circulation of the slides, laboratories which had annually a low number of cervical smears were able to gain experience focused on particular morphological pictures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the reproducibility of AGC as a cytologic category is poor. 13 The results of this analysis were similar when restricted to those women with AGC cytology unqualified. There were only minor differences in the distribution of histopathology in those women with either AGC endocervical or endometrial (combined) compared with those women with AGC unqualified (Pϭ.02), suggesting that AGC not otherwise specified is an admixture of two AGC subtypes.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Notably, the reproducibility of AGC as a cytologic category is poor. 13 The results of this analysis were similar when restricted to those women with AGC cytology unqualified. There were only minor differences in the distribution of histopathology in those women with either AGC endocervical or endometrial (combined) compared with those women with AGC unqualified (Pϭ.02), suggesting that AGC not otherwise specified is an admixture of two AGC subtypes.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Given the high sensitivity for CIN2+ lesions and the high reproducibility of hr-HPV testing (Carozzi et al , 2005b), its role in surveillance seems pivotal for a standardised follow-up protocol in which Pap test, whose low reproducibility rates among centres are well known (Confortini et al , 2006; Tinacci et al , 2011), should be progressively substituted. As any other test, hr-HPV testing may be affected by some false-negative results (Negri et al , 2007) and, even if only a few of those results have potential clinical significance, most of them are due to a sporadic human error in performing the test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytological diagnosis of BNCs is demanding for the cytologist and is not easily reproducible (Confortini et al , 2006). Correctly categorising the cell of origin and differentiating clinically significant changes from benign counterparts may be difficult (Simsir et al , 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%