2002
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(200201)23:1<67::aid-elps67>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlaboratory reproducibility of mobility parameters in capillary electrophoresis for substance identification in systematic toxicological analysis

Abstract: An interlaboratory pilot study was performed to determine the reproducibility of mobility parameters in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC). The study was performed by an intended small number of laboratories (three) that used different brands of instruments (two). The effective mobility was corrected using standards by a method that was recently introduced to obtain a more reproducible migration parameter. A test set of 20 acidic test compounds and 5 referenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, only one MEKC method is reported in the literature for the analysis of acetazolamide in body fluids [55]. The proposed MEKC method is performed using a standard solution and it consists of an interlaboratory pilot study to determine the reproducibility of mobility parameters in CZE and MEKC.…”
Section: Acetazolamidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, only one MEKC method is reported in the literature for the analysis of acetazolamide in body fluids [55]. The proposed MEKC method is performed using a standard solution and it consists of an interlaboratory pilot study to determine the reproducibility of mobility parameters in CZE and MEKC.…”
Section: Acetazolamidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a real injection valve in CE also leads to poor repeatability (i.e. low precision) in quantitative analyses (Boone et al, 2002;Smith et al, 1991). In addition, the discrimination effects from electrokinetic injection can be a problem for sample mixtures with different charges (Feng et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another alternative to reduce the influence of the EOF on the migration velocity is to use the effective electrophoretic mobility (μ eff ), being independent of the electroosmotic mobility, as an identification parameter . To employ internal and/or external markers are yet another options for enhancing the reproducibility of the migration times and effective electrophoretic mobilities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%