1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6223(99)00049-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlaminar shear strength of C/C-composites: the dependence on test methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main characterisation for ILSS is the shortbeam-shear test (ASTM D-2344-00), the four-point shear test, the Iosipescu test (ASTM D-5379-98), the tensile test (ASTM D-3518-94) and the double notch compression test (ASTM D-3846-94). However, it was demonstrated by Li et al [5] how the ILSS depends on the test method: for example in the short-beam test a nonuniform bending moment along the shear plane and stress concentrations under the loading rollers may yield undesirable errors while the distribution of the shear stresses over the shear planes (laminar planes) introduces a difficulty to analysis [6]; a compression test leads to lower shear strength as the failure consistently occurs in a well-defined single shear plane [7], yielding a rather conservative estimate for safety design. Consequently, it can be guessed that also the relation between smallscale test methods and a real on-the-field fracture test yields different results due to variations in stress conditions and test geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The main characterisation for ILSS is the shortbeam-shear test (ASTM D-2344-00), the four-point shear test, the Iosipescu test (ASTM D-5379-98), the tensile test (ASTM D-3518-94) and the double notch compression test (ASTM D-3846-94). However, it was demonstrated by Li et al [5] how the ILSS depends on the test method: for example in the short-beam test a nonuniform bending moment along the shear plane and stress concentrations under the loading rollers may yield undesirable errors while the distribution of the shear stresses over the shear planes (laminar planes) introduces a difficulty to analysis [6]; a compression test leads to lower shear strength as the failure consistently occurs in a well-defined single shear plane [7], yielding a rather conservative estimate for safety design. Consequently, it can be guessed that also the relation between smallscale test methods and a real on-the-field fracture test yields different results due to variations in stress conditions and test geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[2,4,5,[10][11][12][13] The micro-mechanical test mainly includes single-fiber pull-out and single-fiber push-out test. [4,5,10,11] For macro-mechanical test, several testing methods are available for measuring the interlaminar shear strengths (ILSS), such as the short-beam shear test (three-point bend of short beam), [2,[12][13] four-point flexural test. [13] In the case of single-fiber pull-out test, most of studies have been done by using model composites reinforced with single or few fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5,10,11] For macro-mechanical test, several testing methods are available for measuring the interlaminar shear strengths (ILSS), such as the short-beam shear test (three-point bend of short beam), [2,[12][13] four-point flexural test. [13] In the case of single-fiber pull-out test, most of studies have been done by using model composites reinforced with single or few fibers. [4,5,10] Owing to the presence of the neighboring fibers, the residual thermal stress and polymer morphology in real composites can differ significantly form those model composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been made to measure the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of C/Cs, for example, fiber push-in, push-out, and pull-out tests. [12][13][14][15] However, the IFSS of C/Cs has not been successfully determined, especially for the 3D-C/Cs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%