2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-023-5835-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlayer friction behavior of molybdenum ditelluride with different structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the lateral force F lat is determined using F lat = −∇ E form ·s⃗, where s⃗ is a unit vector in the sliding direction. This approach is commonly used in the literature. , The lateral force is a result of the interfacial PES (molecule–substrate and molecule–molecule interactions). Its maximum value opposite the shear direction (i.e., when moving “up” an energy barrier) directly relates to the static friction coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the lateral force F lat is determined using F lat = −∇ E form ·s⃗, where s⃗ is a unit vector in the sliding direction. This approach is commonly used in the literature. , The lateral force is a result of the interfacial PES (molecule–substrate and molecule–molecule interactions). Its maximum value opposite the shear direction (i.e., when moving “up” an energy barrier) directly relates to the static friction coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is commonly used in the literature. 71,72 The lateral force is a result of the interfacial PES (molecule− substrate and molecule−molecule interactions). Its maximum value opposite the shear direction (i.e., when moving "up" an energy barrier) directly relates to the static friction coefficient.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure a, the lattice relaxation caused by the single Te atom vacancy defect had a wide range of effects (in the green dashed box), and the change in atomic position caused a change in the sliding potential energy, which affects the initial sliding position of the tip and the sliding energy barrier. In addition to the phonon dissipation part of the friction simulated by MD, the introduction of defects also caused electron transfer, as can be seen in Figure b, where the charge was transferred from the defect to the surrounding atoms after relaxation, and this inhomogeneous charge distribution also caused an increase in the frictional force. , …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Interestingly, MoTe 2 can be stabilized at room temperature in both 2H and 1T′ phases and the energy difference between the two phases is very small. The rich structural phases of MoTe 2 bring about a wealth of material properties. The interlayer frictional behavior of the 2H and 1T′ phases of MoTe 2 is quite different from its interfacial frictional behavior with silicon. , This means that it is possible to combine phase changes with friction modulation to achieve considerable changes in friction properties without introducing any other atoms. In addition, the presence of defects can promote the formation and growth of a new phase in the phase transition. , Cho et al found that the formation of Te vacancies is crucial for the phase transition of MoTe 2 from 2H to 1T′ phase, and the magnitude of defect density also affects the energy difference between the two structured phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%