2012
DOI: 10.6113/jpe.2012.12.5.708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interleaved Boost-Flyback Converter with Boundary Conduction Mode for Power Factor Correction

Abstract: This paper presents a new interleaved pulse-width modulation (PWM) boost-flyback converter to achieve power factor correction (PFC) and regulate DC bus voltage. The adopted boost-flyback converter has a high voltage conversion ratio to overcome the limit of conventional boost or buck-boost converter with narrow turn-off period. The proposed converter has wide turn-off period compared with a conventional boost converter. Thus, the higher output voltage can be achieved in the proposed converter. The interleaved … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these sources operate with low voltage levels, i.e. from 10 to 50 V. Therefore, it is common to use a high-gain dc-dc converter [1][2][3][4][5] to allow either connection to the utility grid or even an isolated application powering a conventional load. It is well known that a conventional utility grid operates with voltage levels from 110 to 230 V (RMS) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of these sources operate with low voltage levels, i.e. from 10 to 50 V. Therefore, it is common to use a high-gain dc-dc converter [1][2][3][4][5] to allow either connection to the utility grid or even an isolated application powering a conventional load. It is well known that a conventional utility grid operates with voltage levels from 110 to 230 V (RMS) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, interleaving techniques allow greater power processing in converters, because they divide the current stresses at the input and this reduces the current ripple drained from the source [4,5]. As for disadvantages, they involve large amounts of components, which increase the cost, and they do not provide extra gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%