2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1872-034x.2007.00214.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interleukin‐12 regulates natural killer cell‐dependent Propionibacterium acnes‐primed, lipopolysaccharide‐induced liver injury

Abstract: IL-12-regulated IFN-gamma production is crucial during the priming phase by P. acnes, but not at the time of the subsequent LPS challenge. NK1.1(+)CD3(-)CD4(-) NK or NK1.1(+)CD3(+)CD4(-) NKT cells are important in this model of liver injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As cytokines are the major effectors and regulators of the immune response, we next evaluated the ability of spleen cells to produce IFN-γ and IL-4 that are considered key cytokines in the development of Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively [ 23 ]. As IFN-γ can be directly induced by polyclonal activation of T cells, the spleen cells were stimulated with ConA, LPS and SAC were additionally used because they indirectly induce IFN-γ production by NK cells, i.e, via IL-12 production [ 24 , 25 ]. In ConA stimulated cultures there was no difference between normal and dietary restricted groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As cytokines are the major effectors and regulators of the immune response, we next evaluated the ability of spleen cells to produce IFN-γ and IL-4 that are considered key cytokines in the development of Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively [ 23 ]. As IFN-γ can be directly induced by polyclonal activation of T cells, the spleen cells were stimulated with ConA, LPS and SAC were additionally used because they indirectly induce IFN-γ production by NK cells, i.e, via IL-12 production [ 24 , 25 ]. In ConA stimulated cultures there was no difference between normal and dietary restricted groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%