An Introduction to Sociolinguistics 2022
DOI: 10.4324/9780367821852-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlude: identity in sociolinguistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different styles of communication can cause misunderstandings in situations of intercultural communication (Hua, 2013). Studies in the field of intercultural communication have shown that language is culturally bound, and the communication styles of people are affected by the norms, perceptions and values of the communities in which they have lived (Holmes, 2008). These differences in style are not always visible in interactions, as for example inadequate linguistic proficiency would be, but still cause clashes and lead to tensions in the relationship of interactants from different cultural backgrounds (Bailey, 1997; Holmes, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different styles of communication can cause misunderstandings in situations of intercultural communication (Hua, 2013). Studies in the field of intercultural communication have shown that language is culturally bound, and the communication styles of people are affected by the norms, perceptions and values of the communities in which they have lived (Holmes, 2008). These differences in style are not always visible in interactions, as for example inadequate linguistic proficiency would be, but still cause clashes and lead to tensions in the relationship of interactants from different cultural backgrounds (Bailey, 1997; Holmes, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in the field of intercultural communication have shown that language is culturally bound, and the communication styles of people are affected by the norms, perceptions and values of the communities in which they have lived (Holmes, 2008). These differences in style are not always visible in interactions, as for example inadequate linguistic proficiency would be, but still cause clashes and lead to tensions in the relationship of interactants from different cultural backgrounds (Bailey, 1997; Holmes, 2008). This seems to be the case in our data as well, as the participants reported concerns about being perceived as rude and causing offence to their colleagues, which can have a detrimental effect on their communication and working relationships.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LMS theories focus on the social aspects of linguistic balance. Countless factors in language shift have been identified, such as economic, social, political, and demographic factors; linguistic attitudes and values; and institutional support (e.g., Adversario, 2021; Holmes, 2013; Pendakur, 1990). The concept of Ethnolinguistic vitality has been introduced as a predictive power of these parameters over language longevity (Giles, 1977).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A connection between language maintenance and identity of its speakers has been brought up in multiple studies (e.g., Tannenbaum & Peleg, 2020). However, LMS studies often involve a unidirectional linear understanding of language shift in immigration from the mother tongue to the dominant language that occurs over three generations (Holmes, 2013, p. 54). LE hypothesis highlights the individual aspects of LMS, their fluidity, and non-linear nature.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence factors on Code-Switching (CS) as in (1–3) and on Language Choice of Bilinguals (LCB) as in (4) and (5) have been investigated from various perspectives, such as the structural ( Poplack, 1980 ; Cook, 1991 ; Myers-Scotton, 2002 ), social ( Schweda, 1980 ; Poplack, 1985 ; Fishman, 2000 ; Bullock and Toribio, 2009 ; Gardner-Chloros, 2009 ; Holmes and Wilson, 2013 ; Valenti, 2014 ), cognitive ( Müller, 2017 ; Kremin et al, 2021 , among others), and discourse perspectives ( Gumperz and Dell, 1972 ; Konidaris, 2004 ; Auer, 2007 ; Auer and Eastman, 2010 ). One important factor influencing CS and LCB is the relative size of speech communities ( Schweda, 1980 ; Poplack, 1985 ), alongside other factors such as age, addressee, topic of discussion, and language attitude (see Berisso Genemo, 2022 for various factors).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%