2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2016.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate extension of Chow motives of Abelian type

Abstract: In this article, we give an unconditional construction of a motivic analogue of the intermediate extension in the context of Chow motives of Abelian type. Our main application concerns intermediate extensions of Chow motives associated to Kuga families to the Baily-Borel compactification of a Shimura variety.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In section 4.1 we demonstrate that the truncations w ≤Id and w ≤Id +1 factor through birational motives and use them to construct several invariants, including EM Id X , EM Id +1 X . We also demonstrate the expected relationship of these objects with Wildeshaus' intersection complex [Wil12a]. Finally, in section 4.2 we construct the motivic IC X for any 3-fold X, and show that the motivic IC X as well as motives EM Id X , EM Id +1 X have the expected realizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In section 4.1 we demonstrate that the truncations w ≤Id and w ≤Id +1 factor through birational motives and use them to construct several invariants, including EM Id X , EM Id +1 X . We also demonstrate the expected relationship of these objects with Wildeshaus' intersection complex [Wil12a]. Finally, in section 4.2 we construct the motivic IC X for any 3-fold X, and show that the motivic IC X as well as motives EM Id X , EM Id +1 X have the expected realizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The relationship holds whenever IM X exists (e.g. for X the Baily-Borel compactification of a locally symmetric Hermitian space by [Wil12a]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* F is a simple perverse sheaf (cf. As we have recalled, Wildeshaus constructs [1·] * between intersection motives; see also the construction leading up to Corollary 8.8 in [27]. Thus IM(S K , F W ) is a direct factor of IM(S K ′ , F W ), modulo homological equivalence.…”
Section: Connected Componentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…* μ (W ) under the structure morphism m : S K −→ Spec k, one gets the intersection motive IM(S K , W ) whose Betti realization is canonically isomorphic to the intersection cohomology IH * (S K (C), W ). 3 Also constructed in [27] (Theorem 0.5) is an endomorphism KgK of IM(S K , W ), for each double coset KgK ∈ K \ G(A f )/K, whose Betti realization coincides with the usual action of the Hecke operator for the coset on the intersection cohomology. The construction uses the compatibility of the motivic middle extension and the "change of level" maps [h· ] * , see Theorem 0.4 of [27].…”
Section: Review Of Motivic Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation