We appreciate the comments by Drs. Doshi, El-Amm and Gruber referring to our early steroid withdrawal (ESW) protocol (1,2). They state that in our study, 1-year steroid exposure far exceeds in recipients with ESW receiving pulse steroid therapy for clinical and subclinical acute rejections (SCAR) compared to recipients with chronic steroid therapy without rejections (1,2). Short course of intravenous pharmacological pulse doses of steroids is effective for the treatment of inflammation of acute rejection and has fewer long-term side effects compared to either low-dose or high-dose chronic steroid therapy (3)(4)(5). In our ESW study, the steroid exposure in African American (AA) recipients with rejections was limited to pulse therapy and avoided chronic steroid exposure in all patients thus reducing long-term steroid complications. The total dose exposure may be similar in the first year but the incidence of long-term side effects such as new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) and increase in body mass index at 1, 3 and 5 years were significantly lower in ESW group with or without rejections compared to chronic low-dose steroid group (1,2). As per our protocol, all clinical acute rejections and Banff grade 1A or higher SCAR were treated (1). At 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years posttransplant the mean per patient cumulative dose of steroids in ESW recipients without rejections was 375, 375, 375, 375 and 375 mg, in ESW recipients with clinical and SCAR (some recipients had more than one rejection episode during 5-year period) 2375, 2550, 2625, 2750 and 2800 mg and in recipients maintained on chronic steroid therapy and without rejections was 1975, 3950, 5750, 7550 and 9350 mg, respectively (1,2). The cumulative steroid dose at 4 and 5 years in recipients with chronic steroid therapy is unpublished data. The combined incidence of clinical and SCAR in living donor transplantation in our study was 29% in AA recipients compared to 17% in non-AA recipients. The number of living donors (7 in AA and 17 in non-AA groups) was too small to obtain meaningful statistical significance for the differences in rejection rates. The incidence of NODM was 8.2% in 73 AA recipients at risk; 4 AA recipients without rejections (7.6%) and 2 (9.5%) recipients with pulse steroid therapy for rejection developed NODM from 1 through 5 years. More importantly beyond 2 years posttransplant both cumulative steroid dose and the long-term side effects of steroids in ESW recipients with rejections were significantly lower compared to recipients maintained on chronic steroid therapy without rejection (2). This finding in our study confirms that short intravenous pharmacological pulse steroid treatment differs from chronic steroid therapy in the side-effect profile (3). All ESW recipients in our study with or without clinical and SCAR have remained free of chronic steroid therapy for 5 years or longer. The aim of ESW was to avoid or minimize long-term side effects of steroids without seriously compromising 3-and 5-year outcomes of clinical acute rejections and ...