1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02651649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermetallic compound layer growth at the interface of solid refractory metals molybdenum and niobium with molten aluminum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The layer thickness vs. annealing time relation was found: d = 0.0093 · t 1.34 (d -thickness of the layer in mm, t -time in min.). It was also found that the rate of the layer growth substantially exceeds a parabolic growth reported in literature [20][21][22][23] for intermetallic phases received due to interdiffusion of the components in the solid state. Microstructure of the layer that was formed at the front of the Mg-Al reaction was shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The layer thickness vs. annealing time relation was found: d = 0.0093 · t 1.34 (d -thickness of the layer in mm, t -time in min.). It was also found that the rate of the layer growth substantially exceeds a parabolic growth reported in literature [20][21][22][23] for intermetallic phases received due to interdiffusion of the components in the solid state. Microstructure of the layer that was formed at the front of the Mg-Al reaction was shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Although the difference in melting points is very large, Mo and Al form a variety of intermetallic compounds depending on the concentration of the two metals. The few experimental investigations under equilibrium conditions where Mo was exposed to liquid Al [5] confirmed the formation of up to five different intermetallic layers depending on the operating temperature. An interesting feature of that study [5] was the observation of the intermetallic phase Al Mo in the Al-Mo interface, it possessed the highest hardness among the various intermetallics (882 HV), was brittle, and was poorly adhering to the base metal Mo.…”
Section: B Aging Characteristics Of the Conducting Alloy During Intementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The few experimental investigations under equilibrium conditions where Mo was exposed to liquid Al [5] confirmed the formation of up to five different intermetallic layers depending on the operating temperature. An interesting feature of that study [5] was the observation of the intermetallic phase Al Mo in the Al-Mo interface, it possessed the highest hardness among the various intermetallics (882 HV), was brittle, and was poorly adhering to the base metal Mo. Similar intermetallic formation was reported during the diffusion bonding of these two metals [6].…”
Section: B Aging Characteristics Of the Conducting Alloy During Intementioning
confidence: 90%
“…From the literature, [19,[27][28][29][30][31] it has been generally accepted that the defining rate characteristics of the dissolution of a solid metal in a liquid-metal environment are governed by the following law:…”
Section: Formulation For Iron Dissolution During the Formation Of mentioning
confidence: 99%